- Oct 3, 2011
- 14,171
- 38,507
city play 442, why not.
city play 442, why not.
I'm guessing the variant on this would be to have two deeper lying central midfielders in Sandro and Capoue with Lamela and Townsend wide and Ade and Soldado up top with Ade dropping deeper to link play up.Hahahaha! We aren't going to start 4-4-2 away to Man City. That would be suicide! Redknapp isn't in charge!!
If we're losing then I could see Ade coming on to partner Soldado, it would make more sense than Defoe.
We need to stay compact for a large part of the game and then open it towards the end, if we smell blood.
If he did just that and played a flat four midfield with Lennon and Townsend on the wings at the Etihad then i'd seriously question Andre's tactical acumen henceforth.Great news that Ade is even getting a mention!!!
The missing ingredient up top for sure.
If AVB decided to hell with it and went 4-4-2, don't think he will mind, but if he did I'll guarantee anybody he would start Lennon on the right and Townsend on the left.
City away is not the time to try 4-4-2. Our away form is fantastic, a home game against a 'park the side' team is where we should look at trying out Adebayor with Soldado.
If we had done it against Newcastle we would of thrashed them.
Very pleased to hear that Ade might be in contention. Ade playing at anywhere near his best is a huge asset for any club, and he'd also suit our current set-up much better than Soldado or Defoe.
Not that I want to see Soldado dropped.