- Nov 6, 2006
- 1,203
- 12
Whyyyyy? Two Americans in the first team who should be on the bench. Whyyyhhh
Calm your tits everyone, we still have 90 minutes of football to get through. Lets save all the spiteful comments until the end.
We always come out quick...get a goal and then stroll around like fools thinking the game is won and then concende etc. etc.I hope we blitz them and don't give them time on the ball.
Whyyyyy? Two Americans in the first team who should be on the bench. Whyyyhhh
Here's the thing, most people think Vertonghen's a better option than Dawson (me included), and AVB did not hesitate to bring Vertonghen in and drop Dawson. For Dawson though, read Friedel, for Vertonghen, read Lloris. Except Lloris has achieved far more in his career than Vertonghen ever has, Dawson's in his prime, Freidel's in his last season.
People say it's about introducing a new player to our league slowly, they say it's about supporting the old-guard, about man-management, rather than about a strict quality difference, they say, yes Lloris may be a far superior keeper to Friedel, but Friedel was the incumbent and you cant drop him when he's done nothing wrong. They say this is AVB's reasoning. So why one approach for Friedel/Lloris, and another approach for Vertonghen/Dawson?
I am sure Lloris knows whats going on, it probably looks worse than it actually is.
Except Vertonghen had a full preseason and Lloris came in after the season started. I'm sure if Lloris was purchased back in July he'd be starting right now. (not that he shouldn't be starting anyways but i'm just refuting your point)Here's the thing, most people think Vertonghen's a better option than Dawson (me included), and AVB did not hesitate to bring Vertonghen in and drop Dawson. For Dawson though, read Friedel, for Vertonghen, read Lloris. Except Lloris has achieved far more in his career than Vertonghen ever has, Dawson's in his prime, Freidel's in his last season.
People say it's about introducing a new player to our league slowly, they say it's about supporting the old-guard, about man-management, rather than about a strict quality difference, they say, yes Lloris may be a far superior keeper to Friedel, but Friedel was the incumbent and you cant drop him when he's done nothing wrong. They say this is AVB's reasoning. So why one approach for Friedel/Lloris, and another approach for Vertonghen/Dawson?
Calm your tits everyone, we still have 90 minutes of football to get through. Lets save all the spiteful comments until the end.
I personally haven't seen our keepers in training. It is therefore possible that brad is working hard and deserves his place. Perhaps the many of you that are at training could let us know your thoughts?
No? Avb not here?
I personally haven't seen our keepers in training. It is therefore possible that brad is working hard and deserves his place. Perhaps the many of you that are at training could let us know your thoughts?
No? Avb not here?
I can see goals today cos they wont come to park the bus.
They say Lancaster is the hardest young trainer at the club.
Maybe he should start ahead of Defoe and Ade?
There is a GULF in class between Lloris and Friedel.
AVB's handling of Lloris started well.
Its now become a joke.