What's new

The Cricket Thread

Bromavinci

Dazed & Confuzed
Oct 7, 2005
4,123
1,146
Cracking session this morning for the purists.. Excellent fast bowling and some resilient digging in from the batsmen. Great catch from Root (!).. might not be a popular opinion but this is the test cricket I love to watch
 

Timbo Tottenham

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2006
2,331
6,291
Slightly dangerous game being played by Australia here... They need to get runs on the board at some point, it's pretty bold to think that England won't pick up wickets.
 

aussiespursguy

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2015
3,445
6,704
Slightly dangerous game being played by Australia here... They need to get runs on the board at some point, it's pretty bold to think that England won't pick up wickets.
I think with Smith in now, Usman holding an end with Head and Marsh to come we should see an increased run rate.
Balls getting older now too.
 

Bromavinci

Dazed & Confuzed
Oct 7, 2005
4,123
1,146
Slightly dangerous game being played by Australia here... They need to get runs on the board at some point, it's pretty bold to think that England won't pick up wickets.
I agree with you but its not easy out there. England are bowling very well.

Don't forget that before "Baz-Ball" came about, this is exactly what test cricket was (is) all about. The way England have been changing the game is the anomaly.
 

Timbo Tottenham

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2006
2,331
6,291
I agree with you but its not easy out there. England are bowling very well.

Don't forget that before "Baz-Ball" came about, this is exactly what test cricket was (is) all about. The way England have been changing the game is the anomaly.
That's exactly why it's a dangerous game by Australia, because England won't bat this way. 'Dangerous' may be the wrong the word, 'risky' may be better.
 

Dunc2610

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2008
1,604
4,017
That's exactly why it's a dangerous game by Australia, because England won't bat this way. 'Dangerous' may be the wrong the word, 'risky' may be better.
I don't think its that risky to bat to kill the game, if they're still batting tomorrow they won't be far behind, if at all anyway. Classic 'playing for a draw'.
 

Timbo Tottenham

Well-Known Member
May 7, 2006
2,331
6,291
I don't think its that risky to bat to kill the game, if they're still batting tomorrow they won't be far behind, if at all anyway. Classic 'playing for a draw'.
The risk is that England could get 2 or 3 quick wickets and Australia could be well behind. It may well pay off and they hit a soft ball round the Oval for fun this afternoon, but it's a risk.
 

Bromavinci

Dazed & Confuzed
Oct 7, 2005
4,123
1,146
Riveting stuff today. Really in the balance - for all the excitement we have had this series, I am enjoying todays play more
 

0-Tibsy-0

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
11,344
44,148
Yes! Australia should be a little concerned now. Conservative cricket doesn't work so well if you then lost batters in quick succession.....
 

southlondonyiddo

My eyes have seen some of the glory..
Nov 8, 2004
12,640
15,167
Slightly dangerous game being played by Australia here... They need to get runs on the board at some point, it's pretty bold to think that England won't pick up wickets.
The way we are currently batting there is so much time left in the game that you surely cannot bat so slowly in return

1 side ends up facing 60 overs and the other 150. Not happening

Hopefully their painful/negative Cricket bites them in the ass and Cummins can go back to concentrating about just bowling after this series!!!
 

southlondonyiddo

My eyes have seen some of the glory..
Nov 8, 2004
12,640
15,167
I don't think its that risky to bat to kill the game, if they're still batting tomorrow they won't be far behind, if at all anyway. Classic 'playing for a draw'.
You can’t play for a draw when you’re batting on day 1 after the oppo scored 300
 
Top