- Jul 31, 2006
- 767
- 158
ok im am very confused as to why on these forums he gets sooo much criticism. for me it went like this. jan 08 came for big fee from rangers and for half a season looked like a world beater and was very immpressive. summer of 08 got a bad injury ruled him out for a few months. we then signed corluka originally as a CB but we was then pushed to RB in the absence of hutton and to the sale of chimbo. he (corluka)was ok at the beggining but in october hutton was rushed back put in a couple of bad perforemences and was out again for 5 months. redknapp came in and corluka was fantastic and our 1st choice RB. end of 0809 hutton came back again but this time played very well and put in a few immpressive displays and i remember a poll at the end of the year a hottley contested debate on this forum aeguing who should be our 1st choince RB Hutton or corluka with hutton getting alot of support but don't remember who won. however since the beggining of the 0910 season he has received a hell of alot of criticism for literally no reason cos i cant think of anything that he's done wrong:shrug:. and now ive heard people describe him as an awful player.IMO if we didn't have corluka i would be more than happy to have him as our 1st choice RB but i understand that e's too good to sit on the bench and may need a move. so can someone help and tell me waht hutton has done wrong to deserve so much criticism?