What's new

The Daily ITK and Transfer Discussion Thread - 12th August

Status
Not open for further replies.

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
Because someone said "I wouldn't be surprised if our business was done", which to me implied that they think we may have finished spending.
Val said "it would be..."

Which I took as yes, had it not been for the Kane situation, our plan was to have all of our signings wrapped up by now but because of Kane, we've been holding fire.
So, we would have had our 4 or 5 signings completed by now, if it wasn't for the Kane situation.

You've added a t
 

barry

Bring me Messi
May 22, 2005
6,505
15,345
Because someone said "I wouldn't be surprised if our business was done", which to me implied that they think we may have finished spending.
Val said "it would be..."

Which I took as yes, had it not been for the Kane situation, our plan was to have all of our signings wrapped up by now but because of Kane, we've been holding fire.
So, we would have had our 4 or 5 signings completed by now, if it wasn't for the Kane situation.

Edit. OK, I misread the post! I'll shut up now, sorry. :sorry:

Val said, "I would be" not "it"
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
I reckon Sausage questioned whether it was worth the effort sharing that ITK but look what we got out of it, stunning :LOL:
 

Aphex

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2021
6,287
33,052
I mean it's obvious we aren't done, that isn't in question. It's how many and at what level of quality.
 
May 17, 2018
11,872
47,993
I mean it's obvious we aren't done, that isn't in question. It's how many and at what level of quality.

It should be, but I think the last week of dealing with Kane, and having a week of not signing anyone, is enough kindling for people to start fretting about it.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,538
147,626
Yeah, it was part of the caveat of 'borderline irrelevant' as I don't think anyone except Flappy McFlapperson would expect us to be finished, but thought it was worth sharing.

Was deffo worth sharing, shows a consistent positivity from someone who’s ITK.
 

Hotspur88

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2008
3,152
75,220
I visit this forum countless times every day and tell myself that will be the day someone doesn't say something ridiculously stupid or take a misunderstanding to an unprecedented new level....

I guess there's always tomorrow.
 

ProfCalculus

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2021
269
1,049
I visit this forum countless times every day and tell myself that will be the day someone doesn't say something ridiculously stupid or take a misunderstanding to an unprecedented new level....

I guess there's always tomorrow.

Welcome Fikayo Tomori
 

FloridaSpur

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2021
1,117
2,793
(borderline irrelevant update)

VY:

I would be…


Agree with VY, no way has Levy hired Paratici just to move Hart to Scotland and bring in a centre half, talented winger, and reserve goalkeeper. I think he has players lined up and more than one in the positions we need to fill depending on the Kane situation.

It's now just about waiting for City to meet the asking price and then standing well back while Paratici lights the blue touch paper.

Be still my beating heart.
:whistle:
 
May 17, 2018
11,872
47,993
Was deffo worth sharing, shows a consistent positivity from someone who’s ITK.

Doesn't appear to have had the desired reaction over on there. Looks like it got one 'like', one person told him they didn't believe him, and it otherwise initiated another unrelated brawl, rather than anything further of interest.
 

Only 1 Spurs

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2011
642
421
What I don't get Is we have been informed that transfers are not dependent on Kane moving?. Now I can understand not going in for two strikers but we still need another CB or RB depending on where Tomi is going to play and surely we need another winger type?....then if Kane goes we go for the two strikers which has been said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top