What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - DEADLINE DAY!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Danfunkel

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
1,814
5,847
Ah fuck it. It's not our money, who cares. We've got someone in who obviously has more talent then the ones we've shipped out, but needs the Poch treatment.

Would've preferred Isco but what you gunna do. One advantage also he's PL established already.
 

DaveyM

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
103
260
I def think it's a case of Levy being forced into backing Poch after he had trimmed the squad so much. If that's the case, Poch didn't set the price and if it's Levy and Lewis' way of backing Poch and he wants Sissoko so much then it's just fine with me!!!
 

Garyspurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
337
1,408
I'm sure levy has some spin on this £15million upfront with the rest coming in the levy never in a million years installments ie spurs win the Champions league and the world cup in the same season.....
 

wiggo24

Well-Known Member
Jan 5, 2013
5,091
36,808
The original JJetset ‏@jetsetyid 18s18 seconds ago
Ok cue Meltdown It's done
1f44d-1f3fc.png
 

St José Dominguez

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2014
3,592
11,648
It shows what a good state our starting 11 is in that you're talking Isco level players who'll improve it. I wasn't expecting that, I wanted better quality and more suited substitutes - hopefully in Janssen, Wanyama, N'Koudou and Sissoko we've done that.
 

BoringOldFan

It's better to burn out than to fade away...
Sep 20, 2005
9,955
2,498
IF this turns out to be true... the only plus points for me are that a) it may not be £30m if Toon still owe us for players we've sold to them, and b) it's better than Levy turning up with another Rasiak/F. Campbell at the last minute.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top