Show him you avatar on here and you'll be straight in.
Oh FFS… No, it doesn't. Read it again.
Don't swear at me, especially when you're wrong. The original post is so badly worded that it just leaves it open to inference. If it had said ***is really excited to BE workING with him, we could safely assume that he was already there working with him.
As it is it doesn't and leaves it open to interpret that he hadn't yet. As it is it's actually in the same sentence that states about a siege mentality at chelsea and would theoretically thus be reasonable to assume this second part is referring to someone who worked at chelsea with him.
If you guys don't want people to read things in to every little thing that's posted then the text that people are quoting should be written properly and be grammatically correct enough so that things can't be read ambiguously.
A n C, that's fine if I'm wrong about what i've assumed from the original then ok, but you have to be careful about about how these goat posts are put together if you don't want people to run with something that isn't there.
Don't swear at me, especially when you're wrong. The original post is so badly worded that it just leaves it open to inference. If it had said ***is really excited to BE workING with him, we could safely assume that he was already there working with him.
As it is it doesn't and leaves it open to interpret that he hadn't yet. As it is it's actually in the same sentence that states about a siege mentality at chelsea and would theoretically thus be reasonable to assume this second part is referring to someone who worked at chelsea with him.
If you guys don't want people to read things in to every little thing that's posted then the text that people are quoting should be written properly and be grammatically correct enough so that things can't be read ambiguously.
A n C, that's fine if I'm wrong about what i've assumed from the original then ok, but you have to be careful about about how these goat posts are put together if you don't want people to run with something that isn't there.
Don't swear at me, especially when you're wrong. The original post is so badly worded that it just leaves it open to inference. If it had said ***is really excited to BE workING with him, we could safely assume that he was already there working with him.
As it is it doesn't and leaves it open to interpret that he hadn't yet. As it is it's actually in the same sentence that states about a siege mentality at chelsea and would theoretically thus be reasonable to assume this second part is referring to someone who worked at chelsea with him.
If you guys don't want people to read things in to every little thing that's posted then the text that people are quoting should be written properly and be grammatically correct enough so that things can't be read ambiguously.
A n C, that's fine if I'm wrong about what i've assumed from the original then ok, but you have to be careful about about how these goat posts are put together if you don't want people to run with something that isn't there.
Yes. This isn't the thread to be guessing the name all day.
A&C, which player thread should we take this 'guess the player' into?
I jest.
Anyway, I was expecting a certain amount of 'players enjoying training' news coming from the club in the first week, almost as a pre-prepared press release to help AVB slot in, but a lot of the players really sound genuinely impressed and enjoying things.
Probably the best news we could be getting, quite frankly!
Why does it actually matter? Does it matter who said it? In my opinion no, the important part is that the players seem to be happy with AVB which was a concern considering the issues he was deemed to have in his last job.
A&C has done nothing wrong and has stated that we should not be reading into things so much, so stop.