- Jul 22, 2008
- 43,881
- 95,149
Just read brownhead's post history if you want to measure the degree to which this is concerning or not.
Guys, if I could post it, I would but we're still working with the source so it has to wait until we get it into some sort of shape to post.
If me hinting at news to come has upset anyone please accept my most sincere couldn't give a fuckagies, it wasn't my intention to ruin your lives.
As the first person to rate that post "Agree" I take issue with that. By coming out with a sensationalist piece of innuendo with nothing to suggest what the impending doom might be you have kicked off a torrent of wild guesses and speculation, precisely that which you frequently rail against. It's hypocritical of you to have posted it in the manner in which you did and the criticism is not unwarranted.My first inclination was just to tell you to fuck off, you've no idea why it was posted. But I won;t. I'll just let you know that you're mistaken and what's VERY poor is the ratings you got for this piece of bollocks.
Brownhead? Or brown tongue?
Guys, if I could post it, I would but we're still working with the source so it has to wait until we get it into some sort of shape to post.
If me hinting at news to come has upset anyone please accept my most sincere couldn't give a fuckagies, it wasn't my intention to ruin your lives.
Matthew? or Fuckhew?
As the first person to rate that post "Agree" I take issue with that. By coming out with a sensationalist piece of innuendo with nothing to suggest what the impending doom might be you have kicked off a torrent of wild guesses and speculation, precisely that which you frequently rail against. It's hypocritical of you to have posted it in the manner in which you did and the criticism is not unwarranted.
Something like that. The source is good, we've had some spot on stuff in the past, its more what to say and how to word it without dropping people in the shit..Does working with the source mean you are validating the info as it's not from one of the regulars?
Just read brownhead's post history if you want to measure the degree to which this is concerning or not.
There may be trouble ahead...
??????
My first post was no way ITK. Just saying what I think it could be
Brilliant - iceberg = lettuce = cabbage; someone finally has solved it!It may be wildly optimistic of me but the Sigurdsson thing may actually make sense with the 'meltdown' and then 'trouble ahead' (Titanic - iceberg dead ahead)
Brilliant!
Something like that. The source is good, we've had some spot on stuff in the past, its more what to say and how to word it without dropping people in the shit..
Or maybe they see the club having faith in them .....Wouldnt surprise me at all if players or Poch want to go. They arent exactly being paid market value and the club is not exactly showing ambition in the transfer market at all. The team has come 3rd and 2nd respecitively in the last 2 years and we are about to have another window of nothing to be the least bit excited about. The players see the club doesnt have the same desire as them and the fans. We've even gotten ITK signaling as much!