Not a bad option given that there are worse strikers in the premier league at the moment...
... and most of them play for Spurs
I think you're part right. But the problem is that Levy wants to get the maximum return possible on the deadwood, which means waiting until teams get desperate at the end of the window before selling them, which means we in turn get desperate and struggle to find a new striker for a decent price (as prices are all inflated in the last few days of the window) and end up either empty handed or with Frazier Campbell on loan, which many would say is the same thing :wink:
I think out of all those you mentioned, that Llorente is still the very best option.
I am not disputing Original 10's info and appreciate him posting it, but is there a reason it's not posted in the read only section?
Haven't heard us linked with him for a while, a much cheaper option than others. 6 foot 2 and age 26, definitely fits the bill :hump:
Yeah, it was just amusing to see you scrambling round for an explanation of what was pretty clear if you read it calmy.
Most amusing was your second (I think) post where you bolded part of his post massively and asked again what he meant, which was posted directly after a clear explanation. In my head you were running round in circles desperately grasping at people to explain what he meant.
This is the recurring theme of the ITK forum, people going nuts thinking there is something of incredible importance in any given post.
Just out of interest re Rebrab's comment about us making an official complaint regarding Chelsea's pursuit of the banned name.
If I recall rightly .... didn't the FA recently give Chelsea a final warning about their transfer conduct and if it were to be breached again, they'd impose a hefty fine and a transfer ban?
Just out of interest re Rebrab's comment about us making an official complaint regarding Chelsea's pursuit of the banned name.
If I recall rightly .... didn't the FA recently give Chelsea a final warning about their transfer conduct and if it were to be breached again, they'd impose a hefty fine and a transfer ban?
Correct, after the Kakuta affair.Just out of interest re Rebrab's comment about us making an official complaint regarding Chelsea's pursuit of the banned name.
If I recall rightly .... didn't the FA recently give Chelsea a final warning about their transfer conduct and if it were to be breached again, they'd impose a hefty fine and a transfer ban?
Just out of interest re Rebrab's comment about us making an official complaint regarding Chelsea's pursuit of the banned name.
If I recall rightly .... didn't the FA recently give Chelsea a final warning about their transfer conduct and if it were to be breached again, they'd impose a hefty fine and a transfer ban?
Correct, after the Kakuta affair.
brasil spurs alluded to this, i thought it had past, unless there has been something again?
I imagine what they've done this time is different to what they did last time so they'd get away with it (again). I'm not sure what we're reporting them for exactly though.
it was FIFA, not the FA
It was a result of them tapping up Kakuta but I'm sure the punishment (suspended) was only put in place last year? and is valid for approx 2 years?
I'd assume that our complaint is for them or the Kia guy (on Chelsea's behalf) tapping up the 'M' name?