What's new

The Deadline Day ITK Discussion Thread - 1st September

Status
Not open for further replies.

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,010
32,750
Can’t see why Chelsea would go with that. Gallagher I get as they’d be receiving a load of money, but why loan us Chalobah just to help us? FWIW I don’t mind him but thought he was more of a CB for a back 3
It does feel like a "look we're trying" brief. I expect in 10 minutes we'll get told it's off and he's staying or heading to Forest.
 

BD3

Member
Jun 9, 2015
13
41
I mean, we do this as well. I'm not sure how we can complain about it.
Fair, but assuming the Athleti ITK is correct, thats a joke of a deal when Fulham had just offered 30M hours earlier. That's more of the lowballing im referring too.
 

arunspurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
8,836
35,649
Kelly and this.

I mean how anyone can think we hold some sort of plan is beyond me...

I dont agree. Largely, we did have a plan this time.

Plan was to bring in Johnson as forward, Gallager for CM if Hojbjerg left.
Plan for CB it seems its always been any decent squad CB who is homegrown
 

DONOS10

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
430
2,496
Looks like Bella-Kotchap is on the way to PSV on loan. If true, that'd be the end of their Sanchez pursuit. I'd say we're done lads (after BJ).
 

Joshua

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2015
2,213
12,952
Ludicrous to ask for a loan. We have so much money in reserve, just offer a fee if we’re serious. Chelsea hate us and know we’re scrambling for a centre half why on earth would they lend us one to help us out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top