I like the Steed in the middle idea. It was his most influential position for Fulham, and surely is our most creative midfielder aside from the mammoth Hudd.
Jenas has gone off the boil again, as he does now-and-again, so why not put Steedo in his place? (He's probably been the best performer - if not, the most consistent - this season and I believe Lee and Bale has potential on the left; despite them both being left backs.
Despite Zokora's 1%-hill improvement wink: - that one's just for you slothy) I still favour a Hudd sitting and a Jenas/Malbranque pusher-on-er. If not Hudd then Tainio can offer the blocker position, but his passing lets him down on occasion even if he does go back for the second, third and fourth challenge.
So with Bale and Lennon a foregone conclusion (it would seem) it has to be the choice between Hudd/Tainio and Jenas/Malbranque. Of course caveated by 'opinion'.
Stoof, this is absoloute rubbish. he fell out with Coleman because he wanted to play there. Coleman played him there a couple of times and Fulham got beat nearly every time so Coleman refused to play him there any more and henc Malbranque refusing to sign a new deal etc.
We were talking ideally. I was talking ideally. I caveated it with my opinion, I don't want Zokora in the team. It's my choice, and I'm allowed to make it. And do.The last two away games that Zokora has played (Bolton and liverpool) he has been outstanding/very good depending on perspective. So why drop him.
And it should be muted too. No volume. Can't hear you.The answer, as has been muted for a long time now by me and others, would clearly be to play a proper midfield 5 away from home. It would compensate for the individual dificiencies in the midfield whilst playing to the individual strengths, it would offer more protection for the real problem area - the defence - and with Bale/Malbranque/Lennon we can attack from the flanks and with Jenas/Zokor/Hudd/KPB/Taarabt we have the ability to support the centre attacks.
And what a great time to bring up your anti-Dawson and anti-Robinson agendas. I was getting worried then. I'm frankly pissed off with you and your lack of knowledge on this subject. You call Robinson poor without any sort of coaching expertise, any football experience beyond Sunday morning down Hackney Marshes (*assumption*) with all the other Big-Time Charlies that stroll around like they could step into a Premiership team, for them to get mugged off by a 16 year old with good feet. I've seen your type before and they think they know better than everyone else.I am still amazed that "what to do about problem midfield" threads are popping up ahead of "what to do about our shocking defence" threads. We have a terrible goalkeeper, dawson is slow and reads and reacts slowly, Kaboul is inexperienced in this league and young and Chimbonda has lapses in concentration.
This worries me far more than our midfield which out plays Liverpool at anfield.
I really wish you'd stop claiming my stuff as absolute rubbish, when it patently, blatantly, flagrantly isn't. He influences the game more from central positions. As he has done in his entire Spurs career. He spends more time drifting in towards a central position than he does anything else. So why not give him a headstart by putting him in there.
I'd like to try it. That's all I'm saying, that's all anyone in this thraed is saying. And I don't see you having a go at them? Hmmm, can't think why?
We were talking ideally. I was talking ideally. I caveated it with my opinion, I don't want Zokora in the team. It's my choice, and I'm allowed to make it. And do.
And it should be muted too. No volume. Can't hear you.
I don't want us playing a 4-5-1 - it doesn't work. You think we're bad at sitting back in a 4-4-2, you wait til that happens with a 5 man midfield.
The fact you're advocating Taarabt and KPB is laughable. Based on what they've played and interest level, it's ridiculous. They're kids - even more kiddish than the kids we have in there already!
And what a great time to bring up your anti-Dawson and anti-Robinson agendas. I was getting worried then. I'm frankly pissed off with you and your lack of knowledge on this subject. You call Robinson poor without any sort of coaching expertise, any football experience beyond Sunday morning down Hackney Marshes (*assumption*) with all the other Big-Time Charlies that stroll around like they could step into a Premiership team, for them to get mugged off by a 16 year old with good feet. I've seen your type before and they think they know better than everyone else.
Here's news mate: you don't. I don't claim to know more than you, but to refute the claims of others that do - including my mate who's had trials for our club in that very position who now coaches kids in that position; my former boss who played at Conference level as a 'keeper and this site's very own collection of experienced goalkeepers, let alone the Professionals coming out in defence of him - including our own management - is just beyond arrogant
Well it's bollocks. And your condescending, patronising, ageist manner just pisses me off. Your age doesn't equal your knowledge.
You stop writing it i'll stop claiming it. How many times have you actually seen malbranque play CM ? 1 ? 2 ? The rest of his career played mostly wide right. And yet you claim it's his best position.
Your age does. It also seems to preclude you from arguing anything on a logical, evidenciary basis. "Robnson is brilliant because my mate says so".
Your ignorance and bias pisses me off.