- Jul 28, 2004
- 27,719
- 54,929
How exactly did we start poorly (very poorly)? We were apprehensive, but thats a given against one of the leagues top sides. A very poor start is going 2-0 nil down in 10 minutes. The fact that they didnt score, and that they couldn't hold possession suggests we started very well.
I haven't had the benefit of any highlights yet, but from where I was sat I just thought we looked extremely nervy and a quite sloppy, aside from the defence who I gave a lot of credit to for the lack of penetration from Liverpool.
We'd have conceded either way. But Gomes made a mistake. Johnson would have certainly created a chance out of that.
I praise Gomes to the rafters normally, but in my opinion it was a mistake by him. Johnson was moving away from the goal, and once Gomes had charged out he could have stayed on his feet at that point and tried to bully Johnson away. Like with the first point, perhaps seeing highlights later will change my mind, but I think Gomes would have been better off allowing the chance to be created and trying to save it.
Wrong.
Nice detailed explanation. I suppose the plethora of crosses that came from his side would back up your point. Oh wait, there weren't any. Ah well.
Off day, both halfs were poor. Insua did incredibly well to keep him out of the game. In the second half Lennon ran pentratively 4 or 5 times and even without an end product, havoc was created each an every time
That is the last I'll say to you on these issues because our views on the issue are quite polarized and I want to see the match from a TV view before consolidating my views.