What's new

Tottenham vs Bournemouth: Match Thread

yusrisafri

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2004
6,369
7,548
Poch has tried Son at LWB twice, and both times it bombed very badly. Surely if we can see how poor we play with Son there then the gaffer himself would be able to see it too?? Surely he wont be daft enough to play Son there again? Son needs to be free and not be tied down to the left. It just won't work.


4231 with Verts at LB please!!!
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,987
71,414
Surely having TOB or Edwards on the bench is preferable to putting 3 defenders on the bench? Its just useless having 3 defenders on the bench, IMO
 

Sandros Shiny Head

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
4,794
8,765
Poch has tried Son at LWB twice, and both times it bombed very badly. Surely if we can see how poor we play with Son there then the gaffer himself would be able to see it too?? Surely he wont be daft enough to play Son there again? Son needs to be free and not be tied down to the left. It just won't work.


4231 with Verts at LB please!!!
He didn't play badly last time at all
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,322
47,557
Big game today after that borefest at Anfield.

A win puts us within striking distance of United with them coming up soon.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 27855

As long as Davies is healthy against Madrid I'm happy. I'd shudder to think what they'd do to us with Son starting at wingback.
 

charliemouse

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2011
266
497
Surely having TOB or Edwards on the bench is preferable to putting 3 defenders on the bench? Its just useless having 3 defenders on the bench, IMO
Might be a bit of a struggle for TOB to be on the bench today, but I agree with you in having someone like Edwards on the bench instead of one of the three defenders.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,051
32,815
I'd rather have a fat Danny Rose playing than Son at LWB. Hope it's Verts there but KWP should have started if it's a back 5.
 

JUSTINSIGNAL

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2008
16,030
48,753
Poch has tried Son at LWB twice, and both times it bombed very badly. Surely if we can see how poor we play with Son there then the gaffer himself would be able to see it too?? Surely he wont be daft enough to play Son there again? Son needs to be free and not be tied down to the left. It just won't work.


4231 with Verts at LB please!!!

Nah, you're mistaken. He was very good last time he played LWB for us
 

ShaunL84

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2013
3,725
10,853
Win this and we're three points behind United.

Surely we have to win this?
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
Poch has tried Son at LWB twice, and both times it bombed very badly. Surely if we can see how poor we play with Son there then the gaffer himself would be able to see it too?? Surely he wont be daft enough to play Son there again? Son needs to be free and not be tied down to the left. It just won't work.


4231 with Verts at LB please!!!

The last time he played WB he played well. Cut him some slack.
 

thinktank

Hmmm...
Sep 28, 2004
45,893
68,893
This 'doing the same thing again and again - that doesn't work - to prove it does works' is, clearly, poch's big flaw.

The margins in the game are so tight already, you simply cannot willingly present vulnerabilities to your opponents.

I know it's b'mouth, but I still wouldn't get cocky and take libs.

And, quite frankly, it's just a bad fucking habit he needs to get rid of, not culture further.
 

Chimbo!

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,607
3,357
Poch has tried Son at LWB twice, and both times it bombed very badly. Surely if we can see how poor we play with Son there then the gaffer himself would be able to see it too?? Surely he wont be daft enough to play Son there again? Son needs to be free and not be tied down to the left. It just won't work.


4231 with Verts at LB please!!!

Surely, this Son at LWB experiment is over. It's logical to squeeze an extra attacker in when we struggle to score goals at Wembley, but not everything that's logical is right, especially when you play the attacker in defence! Hopefully a 4-2-3-1 as you suggest.
 
Top