Just trying to imagine Ledley taking the sort of questions that Ryan has been fielding the last few weeks.If the decision is being made on optics/crowd pleasing (rather than coaching experience) then surely the victim of "structural racism" here would be Ledley King not Chris Powell who never played for us? Ledley fits both bills.
But WIndy was specific about it being Chris Powell. Made me scratch my head.
Would they not be the same thing? Is appointing a black coach "bad PR" then?Unlikely but it definitely should have been Powell. It stinks more of PR bullshit from the board than racism in my opinion.
He might actually have the glimmer of a point here. Mason is the golden boy who has been fast tracked beyond his competence. Powell is a highly experienced coach who was overlooked because.....? We don’t know, but I think it’s fair to assume that optics were more important than experience here, and for whatever reason the inexperienced Mason was seen as more of a crowd pleaser than the highly experienced Powell.
That’s not racism, but it might fall under unconscious bias. The gammons will never accept it though.
Would they not be the same thing? Is appointing a black coach "bad PR" then?
For the record, I think we'd have to know whether Powell turned down the job before deciding whether there was any racism at play here.
In a normal workplace, Powell should have been offered it first, without a doubt, as he is more qualified. Football is a bit weird though.
With the amount of genuine racism that goes on, I really don't see the need to fabricate racism to campaign about by twisting absolute bollocks like this into something it's not. Beggars belief.
Maybe, but I feel Windy keeps pushing this kind of agenda. I don't think he has bad intentions, but he seems to be paying a little too much attention to skin colour.I did share some of this sentiment when listening to him but I wondered if I was being unfair. (and perhaps structurally racist )
I would gladly let you explain it to me then but i expect that it will start conversation about whole post-marksist post-structuralism vs structuralism aproch to itClearly from your post, you don't even understand what the term means. Try doing so before you declare it "bollocks".
Whether true or not, it's disturbing how many people here want to shut down the debate about this.
Or Mason played for us and is a big crowd favourite who everyone loves because of his story, and they needed some good news to get rid of the Mourinho toxicity.