- Aug 9, 2008
- 5,844
- 6,751
- Thread starter
- #121
Firstly in relation to spending £50m: not net spend. Big difference.
Secondly, no of course not. £23m is a lot of money. The issue I have was you thinking it's not.
It seems people are unable to distinguish between certain clubs signing players, and us signing a striker. Who's bought a striker this window? Just how many have moved? Who are they? Were we in for any of them? The only one I can think of is Vucinic, and then again I'm not sure how interested we actually were. Teams aren't selling. If they're not selling we're not buying. Because they're demanding silly fees that we can't honestly afford.
Teams have strengthened - yes. But have they needed strikers? Gervinho may be one, but is he the sort of striker we are interested in having?
You're coming from a standpoint where you think Levy is intentionally trying to hurt the club. Which is fucking ridiculous. Therefore most of what you write, yes comes across frustrated, but also smacks of pointing the finger for pointing the finger's sake.
Were we unfit? We played on Thursday? Could make a difference? Could it be we're lacking in sharpness? Perhaps. Although, after watching Thursday night, would you say that's right?
Are you not giving Manchester United enough credit? Of course you're not. You honestly thought we'd get a result? I didn't. We haven't for 20 years. So who's out of kilter here, is it me? Or is it you?
Where have I said Levy is trying to hurt us? If you're not reading what I'm writing properly and jumping to assumptions because you have a paranoia set in your mind that some posters are out to "get Levy".
I think Levy is making a mistake. That's all. Can that not happen? Must you think I mean he's incapable of making mistakes and automatically be led to believe I think he's purposely harming us?
I mean for fucks sake. As if I mean't that.