- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
- Thread starter
- #241
Okay it's one of our problems, but why move Modric out of the centre and play him in an unfamiliar role?
I'm not questioning it I'm just curious about the reasoning.
Personally in your formation I'd be more inclined to swap Bale and Modric over.
To be honest, there's a shit load of explanation throughout this thread as to why I would move Modric out of CM, so I won't go into detail, feel free to browse. But in summary:
I feel it would address multiple issues. We are lacking creatively, lacking intelligence in the final third, we have too many flyweights who are making us vulnerable from both flanks which in turn pull out of shape our CM's and leave us vulnerable in the centre, we can't play two out and out wingers.
It's like Redknapp feels he can get away with anything as long as he can stand there post match every game and say "we are an open side" like he's tapping in to the tottenham way, and as long as he tells everyone that he's covered.
As Timberwolf said above, Modric would look good no matter where you play him, because he is our best footballer. This time last year we'd scored 55 goals to this seasons 32. We'd also conceded a couple less.
Bale is a bit like a more powerful version of Lennon, his end product still lacks intelligence at times, Lennon's is very wasteful. I feel we would balance some of our defensive deficiencies and at the same time put something different, more intelligent into our attack if we put Modric in Lennon's place. He'll still roam and come inside like he always did on the left, but he can also beat men - better than Lennon who relys purely on pace and is easily blown off the ball - and when Modric is around the box he gets his head up, unlike Lennon. As a bonus by-product he will also give us more defensive effort and more ball retention as well. Lennon for impact or injuries elsewhere.