Although title relates to us and should be in Spurs chat, This thread is about where the power lies.
Personally, I believe in the cases of Bostock, Fabregas and Flamini, us and Arsenal should have paid more, with Fabregas it's less of a problem as it was Barcelona, but we only paid 700k for Bostock which can only potentially rise to 1.25m.
As a spurs fan, I'm pleased that we only paid that much, and I'm not blaming us, because we're a business, and Daniel Levy's a great businessman, but the authorities should do more to protect clubs producing players.
I understand that we're paying for potential, and it's difficult to price it fairly, but in that case, the courts should rule that we pay up to £5m (including installments), and if we don't like it, then he stays at Palace or goes somewhere who wants to pay £5m.
£5m broken down like this seems fair to me:
£700k initially
£300k after 10 appearances.
£1m after 10 starts
£1m after a year at the club
£1m after 50 appearances
£1m after international debut
Although it could be argued that it would discourage clubs from playing these players, clubs like us wouldn't even think about this, and would understand these restrictions when taking on the players. This would also discourage big clubs from buying all the young talent and putting them in the reserves.
Discuss.
Personally, I believe in the cases of Bostock, Fabregas and Flamini, us and Arsenal should have paid more, with Fabregas it's less of a problem as it was Barcelona, but we only paid 700k for Bostock which can only potentially rise to 1.25m.
As a spurs fan, I'm pleased that we only paid that much, and I'm not blaming us, because we're a business, and Daniel Levy's a great businessman, but the authorities should do more to protect clubs producing players.
I understand that we're paying for potential, and it's difficult to price it fairly, but in that case, the courts should rule that we pay up to £5m (including installments), and if we don't like it, then he stays at Palace or goes somewhere who wants to pay £5m.
£5m broken down like this seems fair to me:
£700k initially
£300k after 10 appearances.
£1m after 10 starts
£1m after a year at the club
£1m after 50 appearances
£1m after international debut
Although it could be argued that it would discourage clubs from playing these players, clubs like us wouldn't even think about this, and would understand these restrictions when taking on the players. This would also discourage big clubs from buying all the young talent and putting them in the reserves.
Discuss.