- Jun 27, 2004
- 6,369
- 7,548
And "their" instead of "they're"To be fair, there are shit loads of English people who stupidly say "should of" and "would of" instead of "should have" and "would have".
And "their" instead of "they're"To be fair, there are shit loads of English people who stupidly say "should of" and "would of" instead of "should have" and "would have".
Yeah but the Arse were really good back then and we were awful. Now we're alright and they are quite good. Their level has dropped and ours has lifted. I wouldn't worry about Campbell repeats until they become genuinely good again...Which looks unlikely under Wenger.
Harry actually didn't look like he would make it. He went out on loans that were not particularly successful.
What he has done is keep working hard and believe in himself proving " if it's to be its up to me". A good example of never giving up. Good on him. A role model for others to follow.
Just seen the full quotes.
"Once a player is at Spurs, you do not even consider him any more to be on your radar because you do not, historically, have many transfers from one club to the other.
“Sol Campbell? He was free, Campbell was out of contract. We didn’t negotiate any price.”
So yeah, we won't deal
Harry actually didn't look like he would make it. He went out on loans that were not particularly successful.
What he has done is keep working hard and believe in himself proving " if it's to be its up to me". A good example of never giving up. Good on him. A role model for others to follow.
Even with the state of modern football such as it is, I still don't reckon there are that many players that would operate in the fashion C@mpbell did..you only have to see what happened later in his playing career and all the stuff he comes out with now to realise something isn't right there..
"He has great qualities and he will make a great career. But once a player is at Spurs you don't even consider him any more."
A subtle attempt to put people off signing for us or just honest to goodness tribalism?
Knowing when to put there or their is fucking hard to be fair.And "their" instead of "they're"
Knowing when to put there or their is fucking hard to be fair.
Fair point, but contracting 'have to 've as in 'should've'How many years has Arsey Weener spent in London and yet he still make those typically French grammatical mistakes.
It's 'have' not 'make' a great career. Go to the back of the class!
Maybe it's a tricky contraction from have to 've and the result can sound like of.To be fair, there are shit loads of English people who stupidly say "should of" and "would of" instead of "should have" and "would have".
Knowing when to put there or their is fucking hard to be fair.
I always go along with the theory on that kind of spelling, that as everyone knows what you mean why fucking worry?
i think the language just develops, do you think we should be speaking as they did in the 15th century?that's step 1.
step 2: western civilization collapses.
i think the language just develops, do you think we should be speaking as they did in the 15th century?