- Jun 22, 2012
- 1,677
- 1,865
The way things are going at the moment every man and his dog seem to think they know what should be done to stop the slide before it becomes an avalanche.
I thought it might be an idea to explore this further in one dedicated thread rather than everyone offering their tactical insights in every other thread going.
I will kick things off with what I would do if I were in AVB's position.
I don't think that drastic things need to be done, more so become a little more flexible and a lot less rigid (I find it funny that AVB previously being an opposition scout seems to approach every game in the same manner rather than tailoring a game plan for each opposition).
If we are to play with a high line, we need to have fast defenders, at the very, very least two of the them need to have pace and even that is not ideal. Preferably we would have all fast defenders or, talent allowing that they shouldn't be dropped, just one who hasn't that much pace. Dawson has been found out by so many forwards it is untrue yet AVB persists with him. It boggles the mind, it really does. The only one without pace who should be allowed as part of the defence is Vertonghen.
If Soldado is to play as our CF, we need play players who will look to supply him. I have noticed in the few outings that Lamela has been given and seen when he played for Roma, that he isn't taken to shooting every time he cuts inside when playing from the right, rather he looks to slip in a cute pass to a diagonal run made off of him made possible because his inside run has drawn a defender to him. Something like this:
Use this11.com for tactics for football
This gives Soldado some service that he is used to and gets Lamela doing what he does best. Likewise we can use a traditional winger on the other side who will cross at the by-line giving Soldado the opportunity to hit those first time volleys he is so good at or react first to a rebound and score a poachers goal. Maybe Townsend on the left would be the best man for this job, as long as he is told his remit is to first and foremost provide service and not shoot from wherever he is on the pitch.
I would give the players a bit more freedom to 'express' themselves. They seem to be spending more time thinking about what AVB's instructions are rather than just getting on with it and playing with a bit of instinct. Someone pointed out in another thread how Paulinho, who looked so good in the first few games has now stopped doing all the things that he was doing so well and has now started to do the whole: sideways, sideways, back passing routine. He looks a completely different player to the all action improvising Brazilian we saw at the beginning of the season. That is a prime example of the individuality being squeezed out of our flair players. I read an article the other day where AVB uses a technique in training where constant repetition of a movement makes it second nature, I forget the name of it now but it seems to me that he is suffocating our players with too much shit and trying to turn them in to robots.
I don't know about you lot but I'm not sure what formation AVB is trying to pull off here (ooh err!). Going back to the playing to our strengths thing I would suggest that maybe 3-5-2 or the now fabled 4-3-3 that AVB apparently loves so much would suit us so much better. I know it is a bad time to be changing the formation of the team and trying to implement a new style but surely before the season started and with an idea of the type of players coming in AVB should have been able to pre plan for his incoming players. Further that still, if his style and formation didn't work out, he should have had enough about him to have had a plan B in his locker. It doesn't seem so though does it?
I would have two sets of formations and styles practiced on the training ground. As I just mentioned, the 3-5-2 for teams we are 'supposed' to beat and 4-3-3/4-5-1 for the harder teams where we need solidarity. I wont go in to the ins and outs of each formation, you lot area generally knowledgeable bunch so I'm sure you can all work out what my intentions are with those two set ups.
For the top teams I would go with, injuries and form allowing, something like this:
Find your football tactics app at this11.com
For when we play 'weaker' sides, something like this eleven would be my preference, again with injuries and form allowing:
Use this11.com for tactics for football
* These selections are just ideas, not what I would exactly pick, so for those of you who are falling off your chair at the exclusion of Dembele or anyone else, the picks are just for arguments sake.
Then, when players get injured, fall out of form, whoever has shown in training or in substitute appearances that they are up to the job take their place and it is then their place to lose.
I don't think rewarding the fact that someone who has shown they are willing to fight for a place in the team with one even though they are not good enough for where we want to be is the right way to go, see Sigurdsson and Dawson for examples.
Well, there are just a few ideas, I'm sure everyone has their own and others will want to belittle mine but then again, its all about onions.
Have at 'em.
I thought it might be an idea to explore this further in one dedicated thread rather than everyone offering their tactical insights in every other thread going.
I will kick things off with what I would do if I were in AVB's position.
I don't think that drastic things need to be done, more so become a little more flexible and a lot less rigid (I find it funny that AVB previously being an opposition scout seems to approach every game in the same manner rather than tailoring a game plan for each opposition).
- Play to our players strengths.
- Dawson with the high line.
- Soldado playing with inverted wingers who shoot instead of pass to him.
- The nullifying of players natural attacking flair/instincts. Making them pass, his 'tika, tika, tika' training sessions spring to mind here.
- A formation that suits our squad, this hybrid, not one thing or the other 4-2-3-1/4-1-4-1 or even 4-4-2 needs to be sorted.
If we are to play with a high line, we need to have fast defenders, at the very, very least two of the them need to have pace and even that is not ideal. Preferably we would have all fast defenders or, talent allowing that they shouldn't be dropped, just one who hasn't that much pace. Dawson has been found out by so many forwards it is untrue yet AVB persists with him. It boggles the mind, it really does. The only one without pace who should be allowed as part of the defence is Vertonghen.
If Soldado is to play as our CF, we need play players who will look to supply him. I have noticed in the few outings that Lamela has been given and seen when he played for Roma, that he isn't taken to shooting every time he cuts inside when playing from the right, rather he looks to slip in a cute pass to a diagonal run made off of him made possible because his inside run has drawn a defender to him. Something like this:
Use this11.com for tactics for football
This gives Soldado some service that he is used to and gets Lamela doing what he does best. Likewise we can use a traditional winger on the other side who will cross at the by-line giving Soldado the opportunity to hit those first time volleys he is so good at or react first to a rebound and score a poachers goal. Maybe Townsend on the left would be the best man for this job, as long as he is told his remit is to first and foremost provide service and not shoot from wherever he is on the pitch.
I would give the players a bit more freedom to 'express' themselves. They seem to be spending more time thinking about what AVB's instructions are rather than just getting on with it and playing with a bit of instinct. Someone pointed out in another thread how Paulinho, who looked so good in the first few games has now stopped doing all the things that he was doing so well and has now started to do the whole: sideways, sideways, back passing routine. He looks a completely different player to the all action improvising Brazilian we saw at the beginning of the season. That is a prime example of the individuality being squeezed out of our flair players. I read an article the other day where AVB uses a technique in training where constant repetition of a movement makes it second nature, I forget the name of it now but it seems to me that he is suffocating our players with too much shit and trying to turn them in to robots.
I don't know about you lot but I'm not sure what formation AVB is trying to pull off here (ooh err!). Going back to the playing to our strengths thing I would suggest that maybe 3-5-2 or the now fabled 4-3-3 that AVB apparently loves so much would suit us so much better. I know it is a bad time to be changing the formation of the team and trying to implement a new style but surely before the season started and with an idea of the type of players coming in AVB should have been able to pre plan for his incoming players. Further that still, if his style and formation didn't work out, he should have had enough about him to have had a plan B in his locker. It doesn't seem so though does it?
I would have two sets of formations and styles practiced on the training ground. As I just mentioned, the 3-5-2 for teams we are 'supposed' to beat and 4-3-3/4-5-1 for the harder teams where we need solidarity. I wont go in to the ins and outs of each formation, you lot area generally knowledgeable bunch so I'm sure you can all work out what my intentions are with those two set ups.
- Settle on a preferred eleven.
For the top teams I would go with, injuries and form allowing, something like this:
Find your football tactics app at this11.com
For when we play 'weaker' sides, something like this eleven would be my preference, again with injuries and form allowing:
Use this11.com for tactics for football
* These selections are just ideas, not what I would exactly pick, so for those of you who are falling off your chair at the exclusion of Dembele or anyone else, the picks are just for arguments sake.
Then, when players get injured, fall out of form, whoever has shown in training or in substitute appearances that they are up to the job take their place and it is then their place to lose.
I don't think rewarding the fact that someone who has shown they are willing to fight for a place in the team with one even though they are not good enough for where we want to be is the right way to go, see Sigurdsson and Dawson for examples.
- Simplify the instructions to the team.
- Approach each game individually.
Well, there are just a few ideas, I'm sure everyone has their own and others will want to belittle mine but then again, its all about onions.
Have at 'em.
Last edited: