Maybe this thread belongs in general football as it's not about Spurs players
But - I was having this discussion 6 pints in last night with a fellow spurs supporting friend of mine (with a dirty gooner chipping in) and I thought it might make for an interesting discussion on here
Basically I think the key signings of certain foreign imports during the 90s is what made or broke teams and set them up for long term success (at least up until the time the oil money came in and changed the landscape)
My spurs mate said Henry - saying that despite him being the enemy he was world class and the best player ever in the epl and had we had him we would have progressed much faster as a club and become an established and successful cl level outfit
Unsurprisingly the arsenal fan said the same (although made remarks that Henry would never play for us and scum jokes etc)
I - In my half cut state- thought about several options
The most obvious two that came to my head were Cantona and Bergkamp
Cantona took Leeds to the title and then begin the Utd dominance in the 90s which lasted until modern days - surely such a player could have made a huge impact with us (even with the rest of our squad and out terrible managers of the times)
Bergkamp too transformed his club - when he arrived we were neck and neck with arsenal but during his time they left us for dust (although Wenger and many other great signing all played huge roles too)
My final decision however was Peter Schmichael - maybe odd to pick a keeper, but I think he was the rock that Fergie's United success was built on and I think he's the player that could have made the greatest impact for us had we signed him
Anyone agree? Disagree or have different thoughts?
But - I was having this discussion 6 pints in last night with a fellow spurs supporting friend of mine (with a dirty gooner chipping in) and I thought it might make for an interesting discussion on here
Basically I think the key signings of certain foreign imports during the 90s is what made or broke teams and set them up for long term success (at least up until the time the oil money came in and changed the landscape)
My spurs mate said Henry - saying that despite him being the enemy he was world class and the best player ever in the epl and had we had him we would have progressed much faster as a club and become an established and successful cl level outfit
Unsurprisingly the arsenal fan said the same (although made remarks that Henry would never play for us and scum jokes etc)
I - In my half cut state- thought about several options
The most obvious two that came to my head were Cantona and Bergkamp
Cantona took Leeds to the title and then begin the Utd dominance in the 90s which lasted until modern days - surely such a player could have made a huge impact with us (even with the rest of our squad and out terrible managers of the times)
Bergkamp too transformed his club - when he arrived we were neck and neck with arsenal but during his time they left us for dust (although Wenger and many other great signing all played huge roles too)
My final decision however was Peter Schmichael - maybe odd to pick a keeper, but I think he was the rock that Fergie's United success was built on and I think he's the player that could have made the greatest impact for us had we signed him
Anyone agree? Disagree or have different thoughts?