- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,263
- 100,639
That doesn't mean it isn't true.
I didn't guess that he was lying...
What's he attempting to achieve by saying it? What's it going to change?
That doesn't mean it isn't true.
I'm surprised by the reaction this is getting tbh. I thought players withdrawing or not wanting to play was a pretty common thing. Didn't Carrick refuse his call up after not being picked for the 2010 WC? Also Chris Sutton refused to play for the B team under Hoddle. Probably loads of cases.
Well, and I admit to falling into this very trap right here and now, we're talking about him again aren't we? I haven't thought about him for weeks tbh. Mission accomplished, by whatever means.I didn't guess that he was lying...
What's he attempting to achieve by saying it? What's it going to change?
No denying your general point and tbh you've taken his comments in a way that is very fair-minded. I agree with you in general. His big mistake was getting into any specifics or not using already publically-known examples instead. Whatever his motivation, be it a lack of tact or something else, it was a stupid thing to say.People are missing the context by seizing on it now. Redknapp had been making the point that the england set-up was not very pleasant for most players (those outside the top clubs). It was non-meritocratic and cliquey. The atmosphere generated by the press and amongst fans was bad etc.
It was part of a soft pitch for the job, I guess.
The reaction of Gerrard and Hodgson shouldn't be surprising, they're trying to get people to focus on something else other than their failure. But the idea that they can 'out' someone for not wanting to play for england is simply bonkers and pretty vile.
Redknapp may have put someone in the cross hairs of these desperate morons but he was trying to make a point, to illuminate a problem that needed to be addressed. There's nothing to be gained by identifying and castigating his 'sources', but this behavior is pretty common...
Walker.
Surely not Walker;
Walker made his Full England debut against Sweden, 24 hours before his son was born. In fact he was MOM in that.
game.
He loses his mind at times , but no way I will agree he is less committed.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...hame-Spurs-stars-who-turned-down-England.html
“I tell you what, I’d be interested to find out who those players are,” said Gerrard, who insisted that every member of the England squad that has already been eliminated from the World Cup has been fully committed to the cause. “If Harry is making a comment like that, he should name them and embarrass them. No one in this group wants to go home. No one wants to go home.
“Should Harry not name them? If it’s the case, it’s disgusting. For me, if a player doesn’t want to be [with England], he doesn’t deserve to be here at a World Cup. The comment is a comment, like ‘them’. ‘They’ didn’t want to play for England. Who? Name them. Is it Aaron Lennon, Kyle Walker, Andros Townsend? I don’t know who he means. Five years ago? Ten years ago?”
Fucking Harry Redknapp, nice of you to start a witch hunt.
(Apologies if already posted...)
I reckon there's only one player that did this: Lennon, and Harry's just said 2 or 3 to emphasise his point, and now his lie has backfired.
I reckon there's only one player that did this: Lennon, and Harry's just said 2 or 3 to emphasise his point, and now his lie has backfired.
I know we as fans don't know the players personally but we do get a good impression of their passion and desire for the game.
Out of all those players I can't fathom 2-3 that would do that and by the sounds of how O'l Candleface put it on a few occasions.
Lennon possibly. No real evidence for that assumption.
My guess is that Harry is embellishing a single incident. Because he's a attention seeking knobhead.
I didn't guess that he was lying...
What's he attempting to achieve by saying it? What's it going to change?