- May 17, 2004
- 3,758
- 2,813
Zaha could be a difference maker to us. If we have to bite the bullet and pay 70m then Poch should do his utmost to persuade Levy to do it.
Maybe he didnt and doesnt want that clause? Is it so hard to believe a player has a bit of loyalty?I think I mentioned before when he signed his new contract, that he was ill-advised. Signing was not an issue, but a clause should have been inserted, which it wasn’t. Players who are signed to lesser clubs have them.
I agree completely, the guy has skill and pace but we need more killer instinct than that. More average players than him have had better statistical seasons in clubs of a similar level. For 40mil yes, but not for 70. You'd be looking at signing Griezman for that sort of price.All of Palace's play is geared towards getting Zaha on the ball in dangerous areas. Son is one of 4 with us, and probably the one who gets the least focus. Think of it this way: Kevin Phillips, Marcus Stewart, Darren Bent, Wilifred Bony. Hell, last season Vardy scored 20 as Leicester fought relegation for most of the season, with Mahrez scoring 12 (the same amount as Son) in the same team.
You may say 'but Zaha is more of a wide player and they are all forwards' and you would be correct, but Son is also more of a wide player than a forward.
Zaha is a good player and if we signed him he'd definitely be more useful for us than several attacking players on our books, but with Son, Moura and Lamela all vying for at most 2 spots (and potentially only 1 a lot of the time) I just don't see Zaha as a necessary addition. That said, I love a dribbler and if we did get him I'd definitely enjoy watching him, but I just think there are areas in our squad (and first team in fact) more in need of new players.
I agree completely, the guy has skill and pace but we need more killer instinct than that. More average players than him have had better statistical seasons in clubs of a similar level. For 40mil yes, but not for 70. You'd be looking at signing Griezman for that sort of price.
LOL@£70m Griezmann...get real.
Apologies, I was still thinking in back in the day terms. That got you most of Bale and would probably have got you Griezman a few years ago. Ideally you'd like a Sanchez level player for that sort of cash.Unlikely. But it's two Douglas Costas or four Yarmolenkos.
yeah he had multiple people marking him cuz they knew he was the only threat, with us opposition defenses couldn't afford to double team him without leaving Kane/etc less marked.I don't quite buy this reasoning that Zaha does well because Palace keep giving him the ball, everything goes through him, if that is the case then opposition clubs knew it and they made him the target of their defence which made it even harder for him than other players.
being outspent by the likes of Everton and West Ham not really where we want to be..
being outspent by the likes of Everton and West Ham not really where we want to be..
Laughable statement.We would be the joke of the town if we sign Zaha for 70m FFS
You meant £170mLOL@£70m Griezmann...get real.
Why ? It isn’t how much you spend but what quality of player you bring in. Let’s be honest both the Spammers and Everton have squads that require a lot of improvement. We on the other hand have great quality all over the pitch and it is difficult to find players of better quality that we can afford and want to come.