dazherring
Active Member
- Dec 18, 2008
- 379
- 366
Lol
Will I should be speaking with redknapp junior this evening so maybe mark will shed some light.
The Daily ITK Discussion thread 9th June 2012
- Thread starter Archibald&Crooks
- Start date
- Status
Lol
Will I should be speaking with redknapp junior this evening so maybe mark will shed some light.
thebenjamin
Well-Known Member
- Jul 1, 2008
- 12,268
- 38,973
Harry will spend the next few months briefing against the club in the press, making sure our inevitable disastrous start to the season isn't his fault, so he can come out smelling of roses and get another job.
The club has 2 options, give him a new contract and back him long term, or sack him. Anything else is dereliction of duty by the Chairman.
The club has 2 options, give him a new contract and back him long term, or sack him. Anything else is dereliction of duty by the Chairman.
Montasura
Well-Known Member
- Mar 15, 2008
- 7,256
- 6,768
So if they want to get rid for whatever reason, but can't because their hands are tied......how about they back him but bring in a DoF for transfer business. If Harry doesn't like it then he can quit with zero compensation.
elDiablo
SC Supporter
- Feb 2, 2005
- 4,579
- 2,950
I love what Levy and Harry have done for the club, but if we do not start next season in a stronger position, then big questions need to be asked about Levy and the future of this club. I understand all the " not going the way of Leeds blah blah" but all this uncertainty is a big worry. Everyone needs to be pulling in the same direction.......
luptic
Well-Known Member
- Jul 21, 2008
- 2,357
- 3,066
maybe the hold up of getting the players in, is because of the harry situation. For me its about time for levy to make his mind up either to keep him or to let him go, this has been going on for too long, and has hinder us as a club. Last summer like in jan, it was not spending the sorts of cash we wished because there was a feeling that harry would be away to england by this summer so what would be the point in giving him the funds for new players, if you were going to have to replace him?
Now we are stuck with him, and we have a problem, either give a new deal or bring in someone else, like was planned.
Now we are stuck with him, and we have a problem, either give a new deal or bring in someone else, like was planned.
JJetset
Lurking in the shadows of threads...
- Oct 4, 2004
- 3,117
- 30,679
Wrong boy to talk to, talk to JR instead!!
Not his contract with the Sun? I mean the guy is a media whore but surely he wouldnt turn down the chavs over his ability to chat shit to the press?
Sounds like hes making a rod for his own back and easier for Danny to pull the trigger.
- Oct 2, 2004
- 48,263
- 47,343
- Staff
- #210
Yet another fundamental misunderstanding of what ITK actually is.
felmani26
SC Supporter
- Jan 1, 2008
- 24,552
- 43,454
Surely it's wholly counter-productive to have a lame duck as manager for the forseeable though?!
From Harry's perspective, he has achieved his remit for Tottenham and has nothing more to prove so is it in his interest to preserve this seasn knowing that it will more than likely go awry at some stage this season.
And from my point of view it seems like the board are underestimating the negative impact this uncertainty will have on our forthcoming campaign and whilst I can appreciate their hands may be tied to a certain extent, it's surely better to bite the bullet now if they aren't committed to Harry long term than face a prolonged and ultimately futile parting of the ways with our season falling by the wayside as collateral.
From Harry's perspective, he has achieved his remit for Tottenham and has nothing more to prove so is it in his interest to preserve this seasn knowing that it will more than likely go awry at some stage this season.
And from my point of view it seems like the board are underestimating the negative impact this uncertainty will have on our forthcoming campaign and whilst I can appreciate their hands may be tied to a certain extent, it's surely better to bite the bullet now if they aren't committed to Harry long term than face a prolonged and ultimately futile parting of the ways with our season falling by the wayside as collateral.
haslemereyid
captain caveman
- Jun 6, 2010
- 1,486
- 2,057
- Oct 2, 2004
- 48,263
- 47,343
- Staff
- #213
This is all fair enough. If there is tension between the manager and the chairman how can anyone be certain that we'll be fine come August?
worcestersauce
"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
- Jan 23, 2006
- 26,960
- 45,234
Maybe our alternative is not ready to come this season, better to keep Harry than a caretaker manager, no?
whitelightwhiteheat
SC Supporter
- Jul 21, 2006
- 6,517
- 3,195
I don't get why their hands are tied if neither Lewis nor Levy particularly get on with Harry. Is the issue the compensation money? They don't want to cough up for sacking him when he's only got a year left on his contract, then he can go for free?
If that's the case they're hands aren't really "tied" by anything. They can still make a decision, they would just choose not to sack him.
If that's the case they're hands aren't really "tied" by anything. They can still make a decision, they would just choose not to sack him.
Roman buys the players at chavs.
Its a hard life to have to pick torres, Hazard and Mata every week....
Must be his inability to not chat to the media that is the problem.
Not one Chav ex-coach has come out and said a thing about chavs and what happens.
CANNOT wait till Danny pulls the trigger. All THFC dirty laundry will be in The Sun.
- Oct 2, 2004
- 48,263
- 47,343
- Staff
- #217
Possibly not if his presence is causing tensions elsewhere.
Dan Ashcroft
Manstack vs The Gay Chimney
- Jan 6, 2008
- 6,404
- 1,147
So Redknapp to be sacked in October and Pleat to take over as caretaker for the rest of the season...
I wish Levy would show the same resolve now to get rid of Hammersaurus as he did with Gunnersaurus when he first arrived.
I wish Levy would show the same resolve now to get rid of Hammersaurus as he did with Gunnersaurus when he first arrived.
Blockbuster
Well-Known Member
- Jun 28, 2007
- 2,765
- 1,568
Any manager who achieved top 4 with what we spent last season deserves a new contract. Regardless of the position we was in.
If Levy moved the goalposts on what success was he should have backed Redknapp in the Jan transfer window instead of signing free transfers.
I fully believe if we brought in Jan we would have finished 3rd easily. We lost key players and form. But it can't all be blamed on Redknapp.
If Levy moved the goalposts on what success was he should have backed Redknapp in the Jan transfer window instead of signing free transfers.
I fully believe if we brought in Jan we would have finished 3rd easily. We lost key players and form. But it can't all be blamed on Redknapp.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Sticky
