13VanDerBale13
Well-Known Member
- Jul 12, 2011
- 14,440
- 34,002
We are picking up a lot of draws lately, I think his next loss in the League will be his last game (if we haven't won a league game before then)
Poch: In or Out? - You CAN change your vote
- Thread starter rez9000
- Start date
And if he didn't have Harry Kane come through when he did and was relying on Sodaldo and Janssen to score goals we'd have ended the seasons in the same place as Redknapp did.
The problem is, we have to look at performances. A draw or loss next match then he has to go. We’ve kept him longer than we should have already. A win and we still look awful, i’d argue he should still go. Yes the season is now a write off but we could still maybe have a go. The players dont look remotely interested to get up for anything now with Poch and they are dragging us down. We cant sack the lot of them so we have to side with them in order to stay up.
Then a massive clear out begins. Sell a few, let the freebies go, maybe bite the bullett and release a few if we have to. Levy really fucked up badly and created this issue. Instead of investing every year and refreshing we now have to drop a massive amount of money in 2 windows to replace 6+ players AND improve in other areas. Its going to require him to fork up the extra cash to get players in january that would cost less in the summer too. There is no way we can keep on this season with a few certain players constantly getting games.
Last edited:
Shadydan
Well-Known Member
- Jul 7, 2012
- 38,247
- 104,143
This points thing again, doesn't matter how many different ways you want to twist it, it's wrong, you can't use that barometer to judge performances across seasons...how many times, fucking hell
fishhhandaricecake
Well-Known Member
- Nov 15, 2018
- 19,284
- 48,203
He is defiantly being a twat in interviews lol. For me if we lose to West Ham he has to go.
This points thing again, doesn't matter how many different ways you want to twist it, it's wrong, you can't use that barometer to judge performances across seasons...how many times, fucking hell
Of course you can. Most managers judge progress on points not position it’s far more accurate guide of progress. That’s why 15/16 finishing on 70 pts and calling it a title challenge was a complete farce it wouldn’t even get you top 4 most seasons. It was a complete freak season and had Liverpool United chelsea not been having meltdown he may well have been sacked that season.
- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,614
- 205,272
- Admin
- #1,931
haha
rabbikeane
Well-Known Member
- Mar 29, 2005
- 6,947
- 12,781
Poch win ratio 54,3%
AVB 55%
AVB 55%
D
Deleted member 27995
Let's hope so.
And Sherwood 59%, What is your point ?
And to get your stats you have to include all competitions (despite Poch playing in CL rather than Europa)
In League it is
Poch 55.9%
AVB 53.7%
Spurs_Bear
Well-Known Member
- Jan 7, 2009
- 17,094
- 22,286
My fucking sainted trousers.
rabbikeane
Well-Known Member
- Mar 29, 2005
- 6,947
- 12,781
Sherwood 50%
Point? That Pochettino's poor form now is so low and lasting that it up against his good years now have come to he point that his overall results aren't as good as AVBs. It's just a fact, ignore or reflect, your choice
Again, only if you include Cup Competitions, which means Poch has been playing the likes of Barca, Real, Bayern, Juve etc. as opposed to the likes of FC Farmers Reserves, which obviously is a little bit harder, unless you have an axe to grind, and want to manipulate things, which you obviously do,.
In League stats are
Sherwood 59.0%
Poch 55.9%
AVB 53.7%
And the reason we have been playing the likes of Barca rather than some of the dross in Europa which we did under AVB is actually because we have a better League Record under Poch than AVB.
70 pts would not have got us top 4 in 5 of last 10 seasons so not that funny.
Tottenhamboy85
Well-Known Member
- Aug 16, 2018
- 2,507
- 7,901
Eh? It’s not based on irrelevant other seasons it’s based on the season that was relevant at the time.
It’s like saying you win the league on 75pts but can’t call it a winning title because the past season it wouldn’t have won.
You and your banging on about points is ridiculous.
Only relevant if all teams that you play are exactly the same, and exactly the same strength from season to season.
But guess what, there is promotion and relegation, teams improve and regress, you cannot compare points, only positions
Totally and utterly irrelevant, only used by those that want to manipulate things to suit their side of an argument. (Similar to your twitter Poch has spent more than Klopp bollocks, which only happens to be true if you make lots of caveats)
Last edited:
