- Nov 25, 2014
- 398
- 1,827
It's very easy to see that a 50m deal for Traore would have been a bad cost/value tradeoff. The thing is (and we have been here before) WHY on earth did we end up on deadline day with him being our only option for an attacking player? I guess I could see that in the past windows with Levy being the stubborn bastard that he is, but Paraciti should have identified and moved along other targets (I don't know if he did this or not, but we haven't heard about much the past few weeks).
It's not like the market for upgrading on a 17 year old Scarlett is small.
It's not like the market for upgrading on a 17 year old Scarlett is small.