- Jun 22, 2003
- 1,680
- 1,130
Yes another Harry thread......
and before i start let me state my position on Harry, to show this isn't a vendetta against Harry.
i didn't want Harry to manage Spurs when he first came, but - by and large Harry has won me over and we can't argue with his achievements since joining - yes we will all have differences of opinion when it comes to team and formation selection, but we cannot argue with his achievements and he has given us a great deal of joy in the league last season and this seasons champions league with results and the style of play.
However i do question harry's attitude at times. He is very defeatist in the press at times (how can we finish 4th when city and pool spend so much etc...) bigging up other teams and doing our players a dis-service.
In addition to that, after a disgraceful performance by the lino today he comes out with passive comments excusing the officials of all blame and letting officials know that they can shaft the spurs and they will get away with it.
This is even more galling when we play the big teams and the refs can give the 'big' teams decisions knowing they will not be lambasted by spurs about their incompetence, but also knowing if they don't give 50:50 / 40:60 decisions to the 'big' teams they will be criticised.
I used to be proud of the fact that we gave officials so much respect, but it seems to be that if you don't intimidate the refs you get no decisions from them.
Does this show a lack of a winning instinct by Harry? or is it just that he does things the 'right way'?
should he be intimidating refs to ensure we get decisions, or should he let them go about their job with no intereference from spurs even tho opposition managers will try and influence them?
I am disappointed by Harry's passiveness today and wonder if this is something he needs to work on if we want parity from officials or if i am over-reacting to yet another couple of 'unlucky' incidents for us?
Thoughts?
and before i start let me state my position on Harry, to show this isn't a vendetta against Harry.
i didn't want Harry to manage Spurs when he first came, but - by and large Harry has won me over and we can't argue with his achievements since joining - yes we will all have differences of opinion when it comes to team and formation selection, but we cannot argue with his achievements and he has given us a great deal of joy in the league last season and this seasons champions league with results and the style of play.
However i do question harry's attitude at times. He is very defeatist in the press at times (how can we finish 4th when city and pool spend so much etc...) bigging up other teams and doing our players a dis-service.
In addition to that, after a disgraceful performance by the lino today he comes out with passive comments excusing the officials of all blame and letting officials know that they can shaft the spurs and they will get away with it.
This is even more galling when we play the big teams and the refs can give the 'big' teams decisions knowing they will not be lambasted by spurs about their incompetence, but also knowing if they don't give 50:50 / 40:60 decisions to the 'big' teams they will be criticised.
I used to be proud of the fact that we gave officials so much respect, but it seems to be that if you don't intimidate the refs you get no decisions from them.
Does this show a lack of a winning instinct by Harry? or is it just that he does things the 'right way'?
should he be intimidating refs to ensure we get decisions, or should he let them go about their job with no intereference from spurs even tho opposition managers will try and influence them?
I am disappointed by Harry's passiveness today and wonder if this is something he needs to work on if we want parity from officials or if i am over-reacting to yet another couple of 'unlucky' incidents for us?
Thoughts?