You haven't made an argument against Harry Redknapp, except for personal attacks.
If he's only looking to improve his own position, then surely a bi-product of that is him improving Tottenham's position too? Name a professional who isn't looking to improve their reputation and standing. Spurs performing well reflects well on him as a manager. Spurs losing 5-1, reflects badly on him. That goes for every football team in the world.
In terms of him being a bad manager, it's clear that alot of the players like him. They respond well to him, and believe he's a good man manager. BAE said as much in an inteview with Talksport last week. And he isn't the sort of guy who would brown nose.
Nobody from the anti-Harry brigade has made a valid argument as to why they think he has an agenda, other than to see Spurs perform well.
Does he get every tactical decision right? No, of course not. But I don't see that he's made any glaring schoolboy errors, where a much better alternative was screaming him in the face. For example, 'he shouldn't have played Niko at CM'. We had no other options. Do people think Harry has Niko down as his 1st choice CM?
Have you been in a coma for 6 months?!