- Jul 29, 2004
- 19,694
- 332,145
I get the hate for the ESL in the format it was proposed previously, and completely agree the closed shop format was a complete no go, but........ Something clearly needs to change because Uefa's stance about ESL being about greed for the big clubs and how they are caring about the whole pyramid etc etc is complete bollocks. They themselves have done everything they can to pander to the big clubs and to make the game more about money than fair competition.Perfect news !!
On Thursday, Advocate General Athanasios Rantos held his closing arguments before the European Court of Justice (ECJ): The structure of the association was compatible with competition law. Clubs would have to choose between Super League and FIFA/UEFA competitions in the future.
This means that top clubs who want to play in a Super League outside of the existing association structure in the future would have to obtain permission in advance. And that is almost impossible.
UEFA statement following today’s Opinion of CJEU Advocate General
UEFA warmly welcomes today’s unequivocal Opinion recommending a ruling of the CJEU in support of our central mission to govern European football, protect the pyramid and develop the game across Europe.www.uefa.com
Group stages with seeding based on previous competitions.
A path into another competition if they fail in the CL
A bigger pool of teams allowing these big clubs to finish 4th and still qualify
Playing on multiple nights and times to allow far more TV coverage money
The list goes on and on and the reason???? More money for Uefa! They don't care about protecting the pyramid they care about protecting their own monopolised interests, and if it was in their interest to make the CL a closed shop they'd 100% do it themselves.