What's new

ITK. Any chance of ....

sloth

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2005
9,018
6,900
Just in case this goes that way, let's remember the site's rules on ITK bashing. I'm sure no one wants to lose access the Transfer Forum before it even opens!

Since I'm on permanent ban for calling Fazza a liar, I guess that means the punishment doesn't apply to me...

In which case...
 

nicdic

Official SC Padre
Admin
May 8, 2005
41,857
25,920
Only asking for a list of people who are known/thought to have the best connections. No ITK bashing required.

Understand the request, but if we produce a list of what we deem are the best connected ITKs, and the ones most worth listening too it's probably only going to encourage an attitude that we don't want towards others.

The best way to read ITK is to see it all as a rumour. People pass on things they hear in good faith. They might get info first hand from a board member, or a second from a mate or from a journo. They could be fed a real nugget of info, or a party line from the club, or a load of rubbish.

The type of info given is liable to change as well. An ITK getting something right once or twice, doesn't mean the next time it will be, the source could have changed tact.

The other thing to bear in mind, is how complicated transfers are, and how quickly they can change. Because a player doesn't sign, doesn't mean the info wasn't right to a certain extent.

Treat it all as rumour, a bit of fun and take it with a pinch of salt and you'll enjoy it and be fine.
 

rebrab

Harry Cool
Jun 13, 2008
6,415
22,129
I understand the reasons for not wanting people to criticise the itk posters, however it would be nice to be able to warn people off listening to one particular 'itk' that knows absolutely nothing, and craves attention like a 5 year old kid.

Agreed.
 

C-oops

Well-Known Member
Jul 27, 2008
4,037
3,373
Understand the request, but if we produce a list of what we deem are the best connected ITKs, and the ones most worth listening too it's probably only going to encourage an attitude that we don't want towards others.

The best way to read ITK is to see it all as a rumour. People pass on things they hear in good faith. They might get info first hand from a board member, or a second from a mate or from a journo. They could be fed a real nugget of info, or a party line from the club, or a load of rubbish.

The type of info given is liable to change as well. An ITK getting something right once or twice, doesn't mean the next time it will be, the source could have changed tact.

The other thing to bear in mind, is how complicated transfers are, and how quickly they can change. Because a player doesn't sign, doesn't mean the info wasn't right to a certain extent.

Treat it all as rumour, a bit of fun and take it with a pinch of salt and you'll enjoy it and be fine.

I know. Mentioned it in my original post
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
Since I'm on permanent ban for calling Fazza a liar, I guess that means the punishment doesn't apply to me...

In which case...
(general statement)

no, probably means you will either get a ban from SC or infraction points that would lead to a ban in the future.

So just because your not in the transfer forums doesn't mean you can abuse the ITK's.
 

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,579
43,496
If this kind of snideyness transfers itself over to the TR Forums anyone indulging won't be in there for long.

It's going to be a long window and experience tells us that tempers are easily frayed and this type of thing really isn't helpful.

Apologies A&C, I for one don't condone ITK bashing and would rather people post on whatever they believe is true than nothing at all.

Won't happen again from me 'guv.
 

chadders

Active Member
Mar 21, 2009
322
191
Doesnt matter how accurate it is, if its get a little banter and excitement going I am all for those who are not ITK at all.
 

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,672
34,815
(general statement)

no, probably means you will either get a ban from SC or infraction points that would lead to a ban in the future.

So just because your not in the transfer forums doesn't mean you can abuse the ITK's.

How many infraction points do you need before you get a ban?
 

sloth

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2005
9,018
6,900
Couldn't we have an ITK bashing zone where all ITKs and ITK believers are banned from?
 

DoublePivot

Relegated to Lurker
Jul 1, 2005
8,987
67
One of the stalwarts of the site (and I apologize as I am not sure who but maybe SS57) actually tried to do a compilation of each ITK and would label their entry as "red" for wrong", blue for "correct" and black for "can't be proven right or wrong". If you haven't figured out where I am going with this, let's just say he didn't have to use red or blue very often.

It's the nature of their style. You can't throw a metric on "Heard we have inquired about Drogba" unless Levy comes out and says (and do you think he would?) that we haven't. They do not use definitive language because that will only get them attacked. So you can't grade them.

In the long run, just enjoy it as a summer activity. There will become ones you like better than others. But in the long run, they are only important in so much as any individual feels the need to have knowledge before others. Nobody really needs ITK because at the end of the day, you're going to know what transfers have taken place by the end of the window.

On it's good days, the TR thread is absolutely brilliant with a lot of good-natured talk. On it's bad days, it's as bad as being the weakest guy in a jail block...you'll feel like you've been through a knife-fight and a day of sodomizing.
 
Top