ITK. Any chance of ....

[sheringmann]

Im sure the mods are reeaallly looking forward to silly season....

But you are doing a great job!!

 

[Timbo Tottenham]

Understand the request, but if we produce a list of what we deem are the best connected ITKs, and the ones most worth listening too it's probably only going to encourage an attitude that we don't want towards others.

The best way to read ITK is to see it all as a rumour. People pass on things they hear in good faith. They might get info first hand from a board member, or a second from a mate or from a journo. They could be fed a real nugget of info, or a party line from the club, or a load of rubbish.

The type of info given is liable to change as well. An ITK getting something right once or twice, doesn't mean the next time it will be, the source could have changed tact.

The other thing to bear in mind, is how complicated transfers are, and how quickly they can change. Because a player doesn't sign, doesn't mean the info wasn't right to a certain extent.

Treat it all as rumour, a bit of fun and take it with a pinch of salt and you'll enjoy it and be fine.

This. If you're after a bit of fun come to this site and take it for what it is, if you want real ITK go to the official site.

 

[chrissivad]

How many infraction points do you need before you get a ban?

Not sure

One of the stalwarts of the site (and I apologize as I am not sure who but maybe SS57) actually tried to do a compilation of each ITK and would label their entry as "red" for wrong", blue for "correct" and black for "can't be proven right or wrong".

Think it was BOF

 

[DoublePivot]

Not sure



Think it was BOF

:up: Cheers

 

[mattyspurs]

Not sure

Well why not Chris, have you not read the Mod handbook yet?

 

[storts]

peanut is the best lads, he knows his stuff.