It sounds like a fart and a burp at the same timeHis name reminds me of the word 'fart'
Not sure why
They'd probably vote leaveWould do a poll I reckon. Let the people decide.
I can't see why it would make sense for Arp. He is a carbon copy of Kane (albeit with better technique) and more than anything needs game time. Which he wouldn't get here.
Massive talent, but when he moves it will be to somewhere he's guaranteed playing time. If he comes here, it won't be until Kane is in decline.
Why do we have to wait for a Kane decline to improve the squad? Would you rather a youthful player who idolises Kane supports Spurs and could reach a whole new level to come off the bench or Llorente When we play 5-3-2 he could partner up top giving the opportunity to rotate Alli Eriksen
We don't need a pure number 9 as backup to Kane. If we're going to get a backup, he needs to be able to play on the wing too, just as Son can do. A pure number 9 will get the odd appearance here and there. It won't be enough for a young up and coming player imo.
And what rumoured players have we been linked with/are available can play 9 and wide?? Surely easier to get a younger 9 then get a player who can play wide and CAM? (Mahrez)
If we have any chance to get this lad it would be a cant miss opportunity. He's not just a pure #9, he can play across the front line and in the hole.
I dont think he's played any other position but bc of his playing style he moves all across the pitch much like Kane. He drifts outwide, drops deep, can be bit of a battering ram, and is willing to run behind a back 4 at the right times. I'd like to see how Kane and him move and play off each other as they both can do anything which would make them so hard to predict.Can he? I've only heard about him as a striker. Is he fast enough to play on the wing?
Can he? I've only heard about him as a striker. Is he fast enough to play on the wing?
Yeah to get the best out of him on a consistent basis he'd need to be played centrally. I'd bet that he could do a job outwide for a game or so, but never for a long stretch. Much like how Son can do a job as a striker for a game, but shouldnt be depended upon to lead the line for a considerable amount of time.Lad probably has a step more pace than Harry tbh. He is a serious talent. But he's a pure striker. You won't see him lining up anywhere but at centre forward.
Why do we have to wait for a Kane decline to improve the squad? Would you rather a youthful player who idolises Kane supports Spurs and could reach a whole new level to come off the bench or Llorente When we play 5-3-2 he could partner up top giving the opportunity to rotate Alli Eriksen
Unless he wants to learn from the best
Yeah that sounds good, but again: real life.
Agreed. Son can deputise fairly effectively, but that means no options for who plays behind; we've basically for five players for four slots (Eriksen, Alli, Son, Lamela, Kane), and four of these play pretty much every game that matters. Would be nice to have another option.I don't know but that doesn't change my argument. Why get a pure number 9 as backup when he'll hardly ever play? If we get a player that can also play attacking mid/wide forward, he can rotate in with our other attacking mids. As far as I'm concerned Son is adequate backup to Kane anyway. Only my opinion, doesn't affect what the club does.