- Aug 23, 2006
- 14,215
- 5,001
Correct. Lack of successThere is only one interpretation of failure!
PSG: Ligue 1 (2021/22), Coupe de France (2021)
Correct. Lack of successThere is only one interpretation of failure!
To be fair, Poch time at PSG was pretty much par for the course as with most managers there. Every manager is judged on winning the Champions league, so if you don't do that you 'fail'. He is in great company.His ‘failure’ at PSG is grossly misinterpreted
I get why people want him back. I just understand those who are only wanting Poch.We need to, as a fanbase, get over Poch.
the point is he didn't failThere is only one interpretation of failure!
I think most of us could have 'achieved' what he did at PSG with that squad at our disposal. It is a one horse race in that league.the point is he didn't fail
You keep on with this "nobody has made a decent case against him" nonsense but it's just not correct.Lots of folks sound pretty upset when Poch is included in the 'next manager watch' thread. No real arguments against him, just urging to stop including him and move over here.
Over here seems to have a lot of that 'emotion' the anti-Poch folks mention often. Of course, the anti-Poch folks are projecting all their emotion too rather than making a case against him. Fact is, Poch is easily comparable to Naglesmann and Slot and should be well within our reach if we had a hierarchy that had any sort of vision or clue.
Anyway, if Poch goes to Chelsea I'll certainly watch them with more interest and be interested in how he gets on over there. They have similar hierarchy issues to us, so it's not a forgone conclusion that he'd succeed there. But if they let him hold the reins, I've no doubt he'll do very well and they'll be a good watch. Their main issues are trimming the squad and adding proper forwards. Maybe Lukaku would find a way back in a different system with him as the focal point up top. You could see Poch wanting to keep Mount and trying to move Ziyech, Pulisic, Sterling, Aubameyang and others out. The clear out there is quite starkly needed. If they balance out, mainly with outgoings, they'll surely rise up the table again.
maybe, but not one manager could have achieved what he did with spurs during his spell, and having both serial winners mourinho and conte here proves thatI think most of us could have 'achieved' what he did at PSG with that squad at our disposal. It is a one horse race in that league.
So let's do another reactionary panic appointment??Give him a call and make the offer.
If he wants to go to Chelsea after that then so be it.
Letting him go there through one man's unwillingness to admit he messed up is humiliating.
And what happens if the managers like Nagelsmann and Slot decide this is not a place to be. The one guy who wanted to be here might be lifting trophies with a rival.
Yeah because we are so much better when we take a couple of months to do it.So let's do another reactionary panic appointment??
Depends how high you aim, echoes of glory 'n all that.There is only one interpretation of failure!
I think there were a unique set of consequences that caused burnout so I can see the logic in it.So, you sack someone from your business, for reasons, and then you make the decision to bring then back? Does anyone truly believe that is a good idea?
Would anyone run their own business like that? People you work with who have been sacked, for reasons; would you re-hire them?