- May 7, 2004
- 42,750
- 78,722
Our first bid was a few weeks ago wasn't it?Was awesome whilst it lasted. Bid earlier next time Daniel
Our first bid was a few weeks ago wasn't it?Was awesome whilst it lasted. Bid earlier next time Daniel
Tax treatment different? A loan fee is probably fully-taxable. On a purchase, you'd only pay tax on the difference between selling and buying price? Could still be done, though.One thing gutting me is why the hell they started considering a loan just couple hours ago (I know they didn't but it has been made public then). A loan with obligation to buy basically equal to buying straghtaway. If Juve wants money now, we could pay ridiculously high loan fee and then buy him for almost nothing. Everyone wins.
offWhat's the current state of play? I can't keep up with it!
Pessimism I believeWhat's the current state of play? I can't keep up with it!
What's the current state of play? I can't keep up with it!
im sure a loan deal can be agreed with the amount of time left.
This has been off/on so much so yeah, who knows.im sure a loan deal can be agreed with the amount of time left.
What's the current state of play? I can't keep up with it!
Eriksen is still here so we have to keep him now and try and sign him to a new contract. Even if that means a clause in his contract that we have to accept a reasonable bid from Madrid.Unfortunately for me this window means we haven’t strengthened sufficiently. Eriksen is surely off, so we’ve swapped Dembele for NDombele and Eriksen for GLC. Then signed two kids.
It’s just not enough.
Unfortunately for me this window means we haven’t strengthened sufficiently. Eriksen is surely off, so we’ve swapped Dembele for NDombele and Eriksen for GLC. Then signed two kids.
It’s just not enough.
And you're absolutely right. But if image rights are that big concern, it should be (probably was) considered before - and current media reports are just clickbaitsMate, with respect, they probably know what they're doing here. Love you.
it could help us - he would be still Juve player playing for us. There is fair chance Juve is entitled to 1) use his image rights as long as he is their player 2) give us sort of sub-licence to use his image rights (although they would be still owned by third party)How does that get round the image rights problem though?
He’s still playing for us.
Clubs can have a 2 hour extension if they put in a deal sheet with the PL...I’m gonna believe until 5
Lets hope it rises up again like Tyson FuryLooks dead.
Someone poke it with a stick...just to be sureLooks dead.
4 more hours of this utter bollocks.Clubs can have a 2 hour extension if they put in a deal sheet with the PL...
Just saying!