- Jul 7, 2012
- 38,247
- 104,143
And in his body
If that's what you're into...each to their own I guess.
And in his body
How much do we think he'd sell for?
Surely nowhere near the £42m we paid for him.
He's a coach not the farkin messiahI'm hoping rather than Jose writing off Sanchez altogether they're just taking him out the team for a bit and want to redevelop him with Ledleys help. Possibly more wishful thinking than anything but I hope there's a player in there somewhere, he just has some flaws in his game which could and should be ironed out.
Steady on nowAnd in his body
I can see us letting him go if there's a deal where we could get Skriniar in as replacement. Probably nothing in the Liverpool rumours but they're bound to be snouting around.
How much do we think he'd sell for?
Surely nowhere near the £42m we paid for him.
The £42m figure was surely agreed in the expectation that as a very young centre back he had potential yet to be unlocked and would develop into a better player. 3 years on and he has unfortunately regressed into a worse player than the one we bought in 2017. I would be shocked if anyone was willing to pay even £25m for him now.
CB is far from our strongest position and he is currently 4th choice. So why would anyone pay serious money for him?
I hope his purchase is a lesson learned. Pay big money for a player that is already at the standard you need them to be at. If you are buying potential then pay a reasonable sum (see Rodon, Dier, Alli etc.). CB in particular is a strange position to spend a lot of money on a player who isn’t yet good enough. Either pay big money for someone who is already there or buy potential for a reasonable price.
He isn't currently our 4th choice. He' 3rd at least.The £42m figure was surely agreed in the expectation that as a very young centre back he had potential yet to be unlocked and would develop into a better player. 3 years on and he has unfortunately regressed into a worse player than the one we bought in 2017. I would be shocked if anyone was willing to pay even £25m for him now.
CB is far from our strongest position and he is currently 4th choice. So why would anyone pay serious money for him?
He's definitely regressed or stagnated, shall we say.
I recall in his first season he was very impressive, he was recovering well and was generally well positioned defensively. It could be that he just prefers a high line. He did have moments in which he looked a little unstable, however they seemed to come against big CFs such as Rondon. However, I remember once Rondon did him for that goal at Wembley he recovered very well and was beating him to the ball. The general consensus was that once he improved that he would be a solid CB at such a young age.
I feel that his second season had a bit of an effect on him. Toby returned from injury and he started to be in and out of the first 11, which I think prevented him from ironing out some of these mistakes and it probably hurt his confidence. The team's regression in that period also would have had a major effect on him and any progress he was making would have been severely hampered by that.
Hard to know whether he can get back on track but I now think we are in a situation in which both Rodon and Tanganga are thrones waiting in the wings for the big moment.
I don't think you can take that as a lesson in the case of Stones and Laporte, those two being extreme examples both cost a lot of money, one bombed and one succeeded you win some you lose some I guess.
I don't think we should write him off yet personally regardless, football is a funny game and sometimes all it needs for a footballer is that one match or run of matches where it all comes together, look at Kurt Zouma for example - he's looking much better in the last few matches - football is strange like that.
He isn't currently our 4th choice. He' 3rd at least.
In last 2 years, there was a loads of centre back who went for more than 25m who aren't better/more experienced/has more potential than him.
For a club like City it makes a lot more sense to take the gamble. For us, Sanchez was the only big money signing we made in a two (maybe even three?) year period. He might have even been our all time most expensive player when we bought him? Seems an odd choice when viewed from that perspective.
I definitely won’t write off Sanchez but equally we can’t afford to keep playing him for years in the hope that he improves. A loan might be the best bet, if we can afford to bring in players without selling him.
I can see why we gambled though and his first season he was fulfilling his potential and it looked like he pulled off a coup so I wouldn't put this one on the club, no one would have foreseen an excellent first season followed by 2 years of stagnation , I just think a lot of these feelings are a bit hindsight(ish) due to his recent form.