- Aug 2, 2011
- 3,057
- 7,156
A performance more down to the quality per player than actually having any sort of game plan or tactics but a decent win and keeps us above arsenal and wet spam
True which is why Neville agonised over his decision, I guess Coady just impressed him more than any other player.
Well played match and unlucky to not score at least one more. Dier had one of his better if not best gave in a while. PEH, man of the match for me.
Don't get the LC love or Winks hate in this. Lo Celso's passes were mostly under hit all day slowing the player down and giving the defender a chance to get back in the play. Winks comes in after we had stopped pressing but split the lines with 2 or three passes and really never put a foot down wrong.
Not saying Winks should start, just that based on today's match I don't understand what some of you are saying. Actually thought LC was the wink link most of the match.
To be honest that's all we need this season, win the last 2 by hook or by crook, and then address the tactical side when the new manager arrives.A performance more down to the quality per player than actually having any sort of game plan or tactics but a decent win and keeps us above arsenal and wet spam
Sorry but I thought Son and Dele kept getting in one another’s way.
Hojbjerg had a solid game, and had a goal and assist.
Coady kept the score down. Could have gone to either, but you normally see the MOTM go to the winning team
Come on, he'd defo would have got a dozen of back passes in for sureTo get 0 touches of the ball, okay...
No Awfulier and we win with a clean sheet.
Can’t be a coincidence
Lo Celso's passes were mostly under hit all day slowing the player down and giving the defender a chance to get back in the play.
We scored two , hit the post 3 times and their keeper had a hand in stopping a cricket score.I personally, would have given Hojbjerg Mom but can completely understand why Neville (a defender) went for Coady.
He made 2 goal line clearances is the space of a few seconds and without him, it could've been a cricket score.
Certainly not something to piss and moan about "anti-spurs bias", ffs.
Sorry, didn't know you could predict the future and know how much of the ball someone may see.... It was a throwaway comment ffs Jesus.
Said at HT here at home that the pitch seemed under watered and a bit sticky.
Maybe it is because we know how fragile we have been this year, and that this was a win against a very poor Wolves team that never realy pressed us. If this was Leeds again i think the same outcome would be as last week.Vibe in here feels like we lost ?
How about we stop fekin moaning at everything for a change...?
Maybe it is because we know how fragile we have been this year, and that this was a win against a very poor Wolves team that never realy pressed us. If this was Leeds again i think the same outcome would be as last week.
Oh yeah, I agree. I did think that CC was very good though, especially in the first half so while I don't agree with Neville's choice, I can see why it was made.We scored two , hit the post 3 times and their keeper had a hand in stopping a cricket score.
Coady played well, but slipped for the first goal and couldn't stop all those attempts we had....so mom generous.