Tottenham_God
Well-Known Member
- Nov 6, 2011
- 2,940
- 5,619
Summer 2022 Window Scouting Thread
- Thread starter Snarfalicious
- Start date
- Status
daryl hannah
Berry Berry Calm
- Sep 1, 2014
- 2,674
- 7,717
Sell on value only matters if a player flops - like ndombele/lo celso. Amortisation writes off their value against tax over the contract, right. Anyway, the last player we sold for any decent money was Walker. Rose went for free, Verts, Toby, Dembele, Wanyama, … even Eriksen was only £18m. We haven’t maximised players’ sell on values for ages.
arunspurs
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 8,875
- 35,775
Carrasco would be a decent buy, if we want to replace or upgrade on Lucas or Bergwijn. Carrasco is a very good utility player - who can play Left wing, right wing or wingbacks on either side.
He is class as well - technically strong player. Also, like Kulusevski has good brains and intelligence on ball.
IMO, he ticks all the box to be a Conte player.
Carrasco at 28, can give us solid 3-4 years and be integral squad member. Yes for me. But dont think he will be cheap though. 2 years left on contract - I doubt Atleti would let him leave for less than 30m.
He is class as well - technically strong player. Also, like Kulusevski has good brains and intelligence on ball.
IMO, he ticks all the box to be a Conte player.
Carrasco at 28, can give us solid 3-4 years and be integral squad member. Yes for me. But dont think he will be cheap though. 2 years left on contract - I doubt Atleti would let him leave for less than 30m.
barry
Bring me Messi
- May 22, 2005
- 6,505
- 15,345
Watched his youtube vid. From my understanding he doesn't "think" Paratici wants him, or maybe Dybala wouldn't want to sign for Paratici, but he's not ruling it out completely. At this moment he doubts he'll come.
If they want Emerson as is lead to be believed, a deal could be brokered.
barry
Bring me Messi
- May 22, 2005
- 6,505
- 15,345
Belgians normally do really well with us. The last dud was Blondel and he was a youth punt.
snakehipsspurs
Well-Known Member
- Aug 30, 2017
- 2,218
- 15,625
Shock horror aggregators peddling half truths again. Absolutely boils my piss.
Doesn’t sound like he actually knows then and is speculating. As are we all.
This is one of the biggest "myths" that I see mentioned again and again on this site. Players values are amortised as part of the accounting procedures at football clubs. But that doesn't really tell you anything very useful about the true worth of the players or whether a club would expect sell-on value.
Son's value in our accounting books is probably very low because it has been amortised over his various contracts. That doesn't mean that we would sell him for £3m this summer, or that it "wouldn't matter" if we sold him for free. Receiving £50m for a player means that you have £50m more than you would have otherwise, regardless of how the assets are represented in accounting terms. To be honest, it would probably be better if football fans (myself included) had never heard of the term "amortization", because it doesn't tell us anything useful about what we care about.
Don't get me started on "the 60m is spread over 6 years, so we only need to pay 10m this summer", or "we need to pay the money this summer to make the loan permanent", or ""club X still owes us £5m for player Y, so they might sell us player Z for cheap". None of these transfers are paid out of a current account or a "war chest", and people get very confused thinking about it like that. It would be a lot more accurate to imagine clubs buying players as if they were taking out a mortgage to buy a house. Regardless of how payments are structured between buying and selling clubs, all premier league clubs have access to finance/loans, and any transfer can be paid back in installments over a long period of time, regardless of whether the selling club wants the cash up front.
Last edited:
DanielJohnCosta
Well-Known Member
- Jul 10, 2015
- 1,652
- 5,846
dybala to inter please - martinez to spurs. twice the player younger
Trix
Well-Known Member
- Jul 29, 2004
- 19,579
- 331,127
Personally hope this is true.
Now it's Spursonal
Well-Known Member
- Aug 4, 2012
- 1,608
- 13,481
Now it's Spursonal
Well-Known Member
- Aug 4, 2012
- 1,608
- 13,481
You really are De Ketelaire or bust? Half agree with you tbf though✌?
Trix
Well-Known Member
- Jul 29, 2004
- 19,579
- 331,127
He's MY first choice but there are others also I'd prefer over Dybala. He's a quality player no question, I'm just not convinced he's the best fit for us, but it's not me building the squad and how it will all come together.
zonbon32
Girth X Length
- Jun 18, 2009
- 335
- 2,167
If you could mould a player perfect for our system and that role it would be Bastoni. He ticks every box for a LCB in a Conte back 3. Anything under £60m and I think we should do it, provided he'd be interested of course.
Ghost Hardware
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 18,484
- 63,671
Barrela would be their number 1 untouchable but your right Bastoni is number 2.
Now it's Spursonal
Well-Known Member
- Aug 4, 2012
- 1,608
- 13,481
snakehipsspurs
Well-Known Member
- Aug 30, 2017
- 2,218
- 15,625
Now there’s a proper statement from a source. So let’s move on from Dybala
- Status
