UbeAstard
Well-Known Member
- May 31, 2005
- 3,374
- 2,443
Looking like a BIG mistake we let him go.
The Football League 19/20
- Thread starter Gassin's finest
- Start date
Looking like a BIG mistake we let him go.
Ray_Evans
SC Supporter
- Aug 28, 2011
- 1,367
- 1,878
I remember reading on here that before he left & when on loan at Villa his attitude was suspect. If he's grown up a bit & realises his potential then good luck to him.
Lennon1981
Well-Known Member
- Jun 30, 2011
- 478
- 937
Looking at the managers Scott Parker has played for if hE picked up a bit from each manager he could do alright. And if he does you’d think he would always come to us. It would be good to see him as manager one day. Bit like lampard at Chelsea or arteta at the scum.
matthew.absurdum
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 3,734
- 10,126
That player onomah looks good 
- Oct 17, 2006
- 10,701
- 25,259
I have enjoyed this game!
He’s literally over-run every dribble he’s attempted. Very lethargic in his movement.That player onomah looks good
No doubt has the odd moment of being mercurial, but no where near enough for where THFC want to be.
Gareth88
Well-Known Member
- Sep 19, 2017
- 4,595
- 6,730
All over the place the last few minutes
Surely an attempt at match fixing? What was he doing?
Gassin's finest
C'est diabolique
- May 12, 2010
- 37,603
- 88,440
- Thread starter
- #135
Thoughts?
Marty
Audere est farce
- Mar 10, 2005
- 40,171
- 63,876
There will always be pros and cons to anything they decide to do. I'm in favour of some regulation being brought in but a flat salary cap means teams in League One could be severely disadvantaged if they get promotion to the Championship (which let's face it is the league that most needs a bit of regulation given how many clubs overspend to try to reach the PL) by not being able to attract the best available players prior to promotion, and most of all I find it a bit strange that Sunderland and Portsmouth have the same flat wage budget as Crewe when their revenues are vastly different.
I think a fixed proportion of revenue (say 60% for argument's sake) would make more sense than a flat cap. Even that measure would help an awful lot of clubs balance the books better than they have previously.
But we have to remember this is what the clubs have voted for, at least 16 of the 24 clubs in both Leagues 1 and 2 have voted in favour of this.
Marty
Audere est farce
- Mar 10, 2005
- 40,171
- 63,876
Hell Sunderland probably had at least one player who cost them all of that £2,5m they're now allowed a year on his own in their first season down there, that's ~48k a week, and while that is obviously ridiculous for that level and was never sustainable they have a huge average attendance and revenue streams that far exceed almost all other clubs in the division bar maybe Portsmouth and Ipswich, it does feel particularly unfair on them.
On the flip side, if Sunderland do manage to adhere to the cap and win promotion they should have a sizeable profit that they can spend on players when they go up
On the flip side, if Sunderland do manage to adhere to the cap and win promotion they should have a sizeable profit that they can spend on players when they go up
D
Deleted member 27995
Charlton seem to be the next club trying to avoid the same fate as Bury.
Gassin's finest
C'est diabolique
- May 12, 2010
- 37,603
- 88,440
- Thread starter
- #139
More dodgy football club owners:
https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/s****horpe-united-club-crisis-future-5350245
WalkerboyUK
Well-Known Member
- Jun 8, 2009
- 21,658
- 23,476
Cambridge United have gone full on “Spursy”
Need one point from last three games to go up to League One.
Game one - lost at home to Stevenage
Game two - 3-0 down away at Harrogate after 19 mins
Game three is home to already relegated Grimsby...
Need one point from last three games to go up to League One.
Game one - lost at home to Stevenage
Game two - 3-0 down away at Harrogate after 19 mins
Game three is home to already relegated Grimsby...
