- Jan 27, 2011
- 1,933
- 10,204
It feels like the stadium and commercial enterprises have given Enic a way of making the club incredibly profitable without actually needing on the field success. As long as we are vaguely relevant they will continue to make money. Levy would probably love it if we won something, but not ahead of profits. They won't care if the legacy fans dissappear because the stadium will still fill with tourists and corperate hospitality types. The only way I can see anything changing is significant external investment, or something to happen that makes us way less appealing to sponsorship etc - like relegation. Meanwhile newcastle, Brighton and villa all leapfrog us in the space of one year. Depressing as hell.
This is misdiagnosis of the problem imo,
The money is all being spent on the team. There have been very few dividends.
The ENIC out movement needs to focus on the one biggest problem and it isn't spending.
It's strategy and organisational structure and discipline.
We have incompetent football minds dictating how and when we buy and sell players.
Brighton are heralded as the shining example, and I'd agree. But put their personnel under Levy and they would eventually fail.
Because when they'd get a signing wrong - as all clubs do eventually - they'd be blocked from trading their way out of it until we've cleared the deadwood under terms Levy deems acceptable (which never arrive).
So they stay in the squad or out on loan blocking any progress and stinking out the culture.
The opportunity cost of this inteferrance FAR outweighs the hit we needed to take on the player 3 years ago.
The required hit to then move them on gets greater and greater as more times passes since they played well.
He's a great negotiator when he holds the cards, and TERRIBLE one when he doesn't.
When it comes to transfers Levy operates from a position of pure ego and not strategic thinking or pragmatism.
Last edited: