- Jan 20, 2006
- 45,213
- 8,229
To be fair to Kezman, he does have a point
Sure, the one his head ends in.
To be fair to Kezman, he does have a point
I don't mean environment literally as in the world around us, I mean the upbringing. Not everyone's upbringing is the same. Some people turn out to be murderers but they weren't born that way, it's a result of their upbringing and events in their lives. We all live in the same world but our experiences in it are all completely different and lead us to being different people. I'm not saying homosexuals are the same as murderers before someone misinterprets me, but I'm saying that people become homosexuals due to experiences and events throughout their life.
My brother is gay and it's honestly not a choice. He told me how much he wished when he found out he was straight and still does to a degree to this day.
I believe it's an inherent geneitical 'flaw' and is only 'activated' around the coming of sexual maturity. Also believe the existent genetic 'flaw' can seemingly effect a persons demeanour; leading (sometimes) to feminine traits in young boys and masculine traits in young girls. That's just my own onion on the experience I've had with my own family member and limited knowledge on the subject.
I respect your view and you're clearly not homophobic or likely to 'attack' someone based on their sexuality, so it's all cool. Freedom of thought and speech and all that jazz
As a Christian myself it is in our belief that being homosexual is a sin. .
Gonna put my neck on the line here and take the dislikes but that's fine.
Kezman hasn't put forward his opinion or religious view point foward elegantly, but isn't it within his right to give his opinion? Everyone is slamming him for being homophobic but at the same time are discriminating whilst doing so.
As a Christian myself it is in our belief that being homosexual is a sin. Given there are estimated around 2 billion Christians in the world this obviously isn't an uncommon viewpoint. So anyway, when asked about a gay pride parade, why shouldn't he be allowed to give his viewpoint? Again, I'm not saying he put it forward elegantly but he's entitled to it and it's possible the translation into English makes it sound more harsh than it is.
I respect your view and you're clearly not homophobic
The way I see, it's a sexual preference, that you are in the majority of cases born with.
A sexual preference - most like the opposite sex, some like the same sex, some like really old people, some like really young people - a preference you are often born with, sometimes situations can fuck you up to swing into a certain preference.
Of course not. I'm stating my opinion in response to his suggestion that homosexuality is the same as being black or Asian, which it's clearly not. Look, I'm not gonna keep on, I've said my bit, I knew it wouldn't be popular amongst people who've now 'lost respect' for me, but I had to say it.
I think it would just be important for people to bare in mind that when we say as Christians that we don't believe homosexuality is right it's because we want to save people, not because we simply want to incite hate as some people seem to think, and I don't think that's something I should be embarrassed of. (Though, as I've previously stated, I don't think Kezman put his comments elegantly or put his beliefs forward very well).
Anyway, as before, I've said my bit and I'm not going to return to this thread as it's clearly going to turn into an internet war, so any replies to my comments wont be replied to themselves. Feel free to rate them accordingly though
That was my point about the gene causing feminine traits in young boys. I just don't think the gene causes sexual attraction before sexual maturity but it can at times alter the conventional 'characteristics' associated with a said persons genderI knew a kid that was gay, he was 5 years old. He played with dolls dressing them up etc. he wouldn't play football or out in the street with the rest of us etc. by the time he was 20 he was a true "queen" completely effeminate, the voice etc.
The point is, I don't think you can say it comes out around the age of sexual maturity, everyone is different.
That was my point about the gene causing feminine traits in young boys. I just don't think the gene causes sexual attraction before sexual maturity but it can at times alter the conventional 'characteristics' associated with a said persons gender
Interesting having two split opinions there.The wife and I have 2 gay male friends. We have known each other for over 15 years.
I once asked them, if they were born gay, or if something had happened.
Eddie replied he was born gay, said he always knew he was. Michael told us he was repeatedly sexually assaulted at Boarding School, and that's what HE attributes to "becoming" gay.
Just food for thought.
Interesting having two split opinions there.
Whilst I wouldn't want to discredit the second mans theory; it could have been he was sexually assaulted due to displaying more feminine traits and he was unaware of this. Conversely many are in denial when they first realise and actually can almost convince/suppress these feelings for a sustained period.
It's not about arrogance at all. I was lucky enough to be born into a Christian family and they showed me the gospel and I chose to be saved. I didn't say I was better than anyone else only that I was fortunate to have heard the gospel whereas others may not have. Christians jobs are to try and spread the news, to get other people to hear it so that they might too be saved.
Let's put it this way. If you found out that in a week your town was about to blow up, would you simply drive out yourself, or would you try and warn everyone? Would it make you arrogant or better than others just because you heard the news first? Of course not, you're just the message bringer. And of course, people will think your crazy when you tell them, but you have to try right? You can't just let them stay and die. And when they say they don't believe you the first time, you would surely try again until they did leave town right?
As for why not 'save' everybody - of course! That's the plan. We don't pick and choose who we like.
It's not about arrogance at all. I was lucky enough to be born into a Christian family and they showed me the gospel and I chose to be saved. I didn't say I was better than anyone else only that I was fortunate to have heard the gospel whereas others may not have. Christians jobs are to try and spread the news, to get other people to hear it so that they might too be saved.