What's new

Fulham Vs Tottenham: Match Thread

kitchen

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2006
2,308
3,657
Another. Two. Goals. From. Outside. The. Box.

OK, we won and three points were what mattered this evening, but every one of the problems in attack are still present and correct. We cannot play our way through or behind organised defences because our build-up is too slow and our movement off the ball is too pedestrian. Another 348 attempted through balls bounced off defenders. Another 463 crosses were delayed until everyone was marked. Unless we can hammer one in from 20m, which fortunately we often can, we cannot score.

Surprisingly, Fulham's midfield confronted and often dominated Sandro and Capoue - what's that about? We seemed to have more of the ball with a makeshift midfield consisting of Lennon, Chadli, Holtby,Townsend and Paulinho than we had when we had a hard-tackling double pivot.

Nothing has been proven. We still haven't worked out how to solve the problems. At least we won. Chiriches' reputation takes another step forward. Lennon demonstrates again that he has to play on the right. Lamela demonstrates again that he needs to get stronger. And we have the best goalkeeper in the league.

Disagree with the sentiment of the first paragraph. We made some great chances inside the box today, but our finishing was simply appalling. Just because we scored from shots outside doesn't mean we didn't have chances inside today.

The most pleasing thing for me is that our high line seems to have dropped back somewhat. It's such a risky strategy in a really pacy league, and it seems that AVB is learning...
 

Darragh

Active Member
Aug 22, 2013
513
298
my god that spurs team are a joke.

ten yard passes going way off mark.. , not able to clear any type of ball, constantly giving it away and not creating a single thing and when we do defoe does his usual... it took two unreal shots from 25 + yeards out to rescue game...

what do spurs players do during the week.. everytime they go on pitch they look punch drunk and like a bunch of lads who just bumped into each other and fancy a kick around. lack of intelligence out on that field with possession is nothing short of comical at times.


clueless, no imagination, lazy arse limited movement and villas boas gets away with it again with comical subs..

that game tonight should have bebeen over at half time. no one works hard enough and fulham are a woeful side yet we made them look half decent. unreal and haunted to get three points.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,162
100,376
Another. Two. Goals. From. Outside. The. Box.

OK, we won and three points were what mattered this evening, but every one of the problems in attack are still present and correct. We cannot play our way through or behind organised defences because our build-up is too slow and our movement off the ball is too pedestrian. Another 348 attempted through balls bounced off defenders. Another 463 crosses were delayed until everyone was marked. Unless we can hammer one in from 20m, which fortunately we often can, we cannot score.

Surprisingly, Fulham's midfield confronted and often dominated Sandro and Capoue - what's that about? We seemed to have more of the ball with a makeshift midfield consisting of Lennon, Chadli, Holtby,Townsend and Paulinho than we had when we had a hard-tackling double pivot.

Nothing has been proven. We still haven't worked out how to solve the problems. At least we won. Chiriches' reputation takes another step forward. Lennon demonstrates again that he has to play on the right. Lamela demonstrates again that he needs to get stronger. And we have the best goalkeeper in the league.

Spot on again mate.
 

gorky

Active Member
Sep 26, 2013
318
361
We may have won but it was another awful performance under AVB. Do you really want to keep watching Spurs play this way. I for one do not.

Not the point though is it. My point was that any "spurs fan" who wants to lose, for whatever reason, is a **** and not a spurs fan. Simple as that.
 

Gedson100

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2012
4,487
14,648
Two weeks ago everyone moans we can't score.

Now people moan we're lucky to score from outside the box.

People like moaning. :LOL:
 

ibbz

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2004
1,837
951
No penetration??!?!?!?!?

You weren't watching when Paulinho was 6 yards from goal and skied over?

You weren't watching when Lamela side footed it round the post when it was easier to hit the target?

You weren't watching when Defoe back heeled it, ricocheted to Sandro where a deflection stopped it going in?

You weren't watching when Defoe was 1 on 1 and put the ball over?

The ONLY thing I agree with you on, is Dawson needs to be dropped. But that's not going to happen til we have someone fit enough to step into CB.

yes, against FULHAM - shit team who were stuffed by West Ham not long back, and still NO GOALS from those half chances.
And then when we went a goal down? What happened then?
premature ejaculation, that's what.
We have the players, but unfortunately, we don't have the right man in charge
 

benski

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2006
574
825
[quote="trevo, post: 3724122, member: 14104"
Er no. I'm not even convinced we train together. I thnk they just turn up on the day.[/quote]

Haha I was just saying the same thing. I think they just spend days at the bookies or playing football manager coz they sure as shit aren't learning much!
 

CowInAComa

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
7,293
18,237
Great result, absolutely great. You can still give credit for that even if the performance was still concerning in patches.

Nevertheless it was great character to come back and win.

absolutely. we have great players capable of doing great things to win us games, we saw wonder goals and wonder saves.

they dont get much help with the tactics though.
 

CrazyHeart

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2013
3,702
4,288
Another. Two. Goals. From. Outside. The. Box.

OK, we won and three points were what mattered this evening, but every one of the problems in attack are still present and correct. We cannot play our way through or behind organised defences because our build-up is too slow and our movement off the ball is too pedestrian. Another 348 attempted through balls bounced off defenders. Another 463 crosses were delayed until everyone was marked. Unless we can hammer one in from 20m, which fortunately we often can, we cannot score.

Surprisingly, Fulham's midfield confronted and often dominated Sandro and Capoue - what's that about? We seemed to have more of the ball with a makeshift midfield consisting of Lennon, Chadli, Holtby,Townsend and Paulinho than we had when we had a hard-tackling double pivot.

Nothing has been proven. We still haven't worked out how to solve the problems. At least we won. Chiriches' reputation takes another step forward. Lennon demonstrates again that he has to play on the right. Lamela demonstrates again that he needs to get stronger. And we have the best goalkeeper in the league.

I disagree. Finishing has been the problem in the last gazillion games for us. If our guys actually found the back of the net instead of fluffing around we'd be winning games by 2 goal margins at the very least. That's down to the players. Plain and simple.
 

thinktank

Hmmm...
Sep 28, 2004
45,893
68,893
I thought Lamela played very well.
No doubt and he's my boy, but there is a bigger cause than lamela at the moment and that's getting some familiarity between some of the core players.

You can see that they don't know what anyone is going to do at any given point in time, it's all played by ear.

They need to get to know each other's games and have automatic movement and combinations that they pull-off naturally in games because they've been practised so much.

Lamela is going to be a star for us, I have no doubt about that. He's miles ahead of most of the players in terms of vision and movement.
 

paulcumpstone

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
8,781
10,892
decent win against what was a well up for it Fulham, happy to escape with 3 points but still think we are a shambles, too many changes from game to game, isn't helping cohesion and the negative amount of defensive players on the pitch coupled with playing lennon on the left from the off just mean't we started another game on the backfoot.
 

haxman

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2007
16,933
8,176
Lol, BT sport presenter "There have been some big shocks tonight, Man Utd lose at home, Tottenham win". Cheeky ****!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
9,265
11,314
Thank bloody god!
Hate to say it but it's going to come down to goal difference and Everton are already +11 on us.....
 

EllenAlex

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2013
1,030
719
You're fortunate. You wouldn't get relegated to my proposed make-believe league system.

Why? Are you sold on AVB yet? Do you not feel he can do more, considering his achievements at Porto.

Granted, it is a weaker league; but we have one of the best squads, on an individual basis, in the PL.
 

FinnYid

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2006
4,543
4,145
Great result, absolutely great. You can still give credit for that even if the performance was still concerning in patches.

Nevertheless it was great character to come back and win.

It is great result, however there was little character to be seen before Vlad goal out of the blue. Hadn't that materialized there would probably been close to zero effort, at least that's what it seemed between their goal and our first.
 

jurgen

Busy ****
Jul 5, 2008
6,748
17,344
yes, against FULHAM - shit team who were stuffed by West Ham not long back, and still NO GOALS from those half chances.
And then when we went a goal down? What happened then?
premature ejaculation, that's what.
We have the players, but unfortunately, we don't have the right man in charge

Didn't you hate Redknapp with a passion too? So what is your suggestion?
 

Kirito

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
4,876
9,511
No Dawson and Defoe next game please.

Why do I get the feeling that this was a missed opportunity for Soldado to get some goals.
 
Top