The reason we asked Storts to stop posting ITK in here years back was that's lot of the time it was rehashed newspaper reports...
Never know..
Agreed. Way to much dough for a left back.£27m minimum I don't think so
You asked me to stop posting ITK did you? News to me
You asked me to stop posting ITK did you? News to me
You really want to go into it? You threw a big strop, quit here and joined COYS.
Not a Poch fan then.....I'm still not on board with "Poch is coming, it's done"-rumours.
They said LvG was done. Let's face it, Poch at this point is as advanced as LvG was last somebody said "LvG is done".
Nobody, Levy least of all, would progress only one manager at a time. No. You take one alternative as far as need be without having to make a decision. You also take another attractive alternative equally far. When you stand at the final cross road, you choose what you think is best.
There will come reports stating that Spurs is talking with FdB. Or Benitez. Or Ancelotti, for all I know.
And frankly, why wouldn't they look into more options?
Poch is not done. Yet.
He could be with us 15 years, stunning left back for his age. Worth every penny. But we wont pay itAgreed. Way to much dough for a left back.
Those saying it must be lallana, how did you come to that?
And for those asking the itk to be explained, the way I saw it was that Trix spoke to an agent of a southampton player. That agent said Pochettino has asked said agent to ensure the player whom the agent is responsible for does not sign anything, as negotiating anything like that would be down to the agent. This could range from transfers to contract extensions at southampton. Nothing about the player being pochettino's player or anything like that, just poch asking the person responsible for a southampton player to delay on any decisions regarding the players immediate future.
I agree lallana fits the bill, but so do a number of players, yet some people seem adamant it must be lallana. If we're going by players linked with a move from saints, it could be one of lallana, shaw, schneiderlin, Rodriguez, clyne etc. even then it could be about a player looking to move that the papers haven't got wind of yet, but poch wants to bring with, or like I said it could just be regarding a contract extension at saints so it could even be a youth player like chambers or ward-Prowse.Yes, I think your paragraph there is an accurate interpretation.
I think there's a good chance it's Lallana because by multiple reports Liverpool has put in a bid, and Lallana is keen on it. It would make since given a positional weakness in our squad, that Poch would have at least asked the player through his agent to hold out until we at least make an offer before signing any papers. Would make sense that Lallana would afford his manager at least that.
I bet it wouldn't be public relations.
I've no idea, but it would be pertinent to recall the furore last summer surrounding both Benteke & Villa. Both got ITKed to fuck and looked like they were happening and turned to nothing. With talk of Southampton ITKs thinking Poch stays, it's also worth remembering we only notice the ITKs that are speaking not the ones who remain silent.This is starting to reek a bit. I wonder if it's more agent driven than THFC driven.
He wants Chelsea anyway.He could be with us 15 years, stunning left back for his age. Worth every penny. But we wont pay it
That is true, but I'd rather we went for a cheaper option, and spent the rest of the money elsewhere. Although left back is our most gaping hole at the moment, we have other issues as well.He could be with us 15 years, stunning left back for his age. Worth every penny. But we wont pay it