- Jun 4, 2005
- 6,800
- 7,697
On a brighter note...at least the fucking buildings gone now! Can we proceed with the stadium any sooner?
Building is still there, couldn't even burn it down. That's the strongest argument for it being a Spurs job.
On a brighter note...at least the fucking buildings gone now! Can we proceed with the stadium any sooner?
On a brighter note...at least the fucking buildings gone now! Can we proceed with the stadium any sooner?
no. It was discovered that it was built on an old heritage spot and is now part of National Trust.
But you're not actually playing devils advocate at all.
You're trying to suggest that Archway didn't complain to the cops about threats in the past, therefore they somehow weren't that bothered, and so that legitimises the idea they burned down their own business.
The cops don't call threats of Arson etc by twitter 'long distance nonsense.'
Looking at Archway on Twitter - it's pretty obvious that they were reporting people, and that the were taking screenshots etc. Now there has been a crime my guess is they'll look at those making the threats and see what gives.
Their argument has been that Spurs having a bigger stadium isn't good for the community. This could help themI don't really see how this should effect us - everyone saying it's the worst thing that could possibly happen - I thought the same initially, but thinking about it, what would it really do to the situation and the High Court verdict on the CPO?
If some idiot Spurs fan ends up being prosecuted why should that effect the club or the bid? There's no connection between the two - it's not like Spurs could be accused of sending someone in. It's possible things might drag out a little if a criminal investigation needs to be conducted on the site, but the judgement isn't due to sit for months anyway.
Not sure this would honestly make any difference - we want the land, not the buildings. They were refusing to sell the land, not the buildings (not really). The only real impact looks like it would be from a PR point of view - people will make jokes, and the crazy owner clearly wants to create an arson case to somehow try and help his resistance to the bid. But it won't. If anything if the workshop is destroyed, do they even have a viable business on the site anymore?
It looks suspicious to me but more from the 'did they sort this themselves, or try to turn an accident to their own advantage' rather than 'could this damage Spurs'.
no. It was discovered that it was built on an old heritage spot and is now part of National Trust.
Update and quotes from the family on what will happen next here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11252068/Fire-breaks-out-at-sheet-metal-firm-blocking-Tottenham-Hotspurs-new-100m-stadium.html
Their argument has been that Spurs having a bigger stadium isn't good for the community. This could help them
If its arson then they will say that more fans isn't good for the community as they are a bunch of hooligans citing their death threats, abuse on twitter, arson and etc.Gah? How? Because it will cause more accidental fires?
It was on Twitter first. The guy in here stole it.Isn't that joke in the article from here?
Update and quotes from the family on what will happen next here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...king-Tottenham-Hotspurs-new-100m-stadium.html
Isn't that joke in the article from here?
If its arson then they will say that more fans isn't good for the community as they are a bunch of hooligans citing their death threats, abuse on twitter, arson and etc.
This was always a period in which fans needed to leave them alone, that was clear when they made their twitter account from private back to public
If you were a really clever arsonist, you'd not leave the cans there, in case the police thought that no arsonist would ever leave two petrol cans behind, but then thought that a clever arsonist would leave the cans so the police would think no real arsonist could've done it, thus leading to a never-ending circular paradox where the fire couldn't have been caused by an arsonist, and at the same time was almost certainly caused by an arsonist...
Confused the fuck out of me, that's for sure.
no. It was discovered that it was built on an old heritage spot and is now part of National Trust.
So just for the possibility of clarification and closure, if for some obscene reason I decided to follow the career path of an arsonist, is it better to leave the cans, or take them with you?