What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 31st December 2014

Status
Not open for further replies.

XSuicideBunnyX

FM Champion 2015
Aug 3, 2013
839
1,191
I would be sad about Soldado, but the rest…...
I'd also be sad to see Naughton go - he's been with us a fair while, and is one of the better back-up RBs in the league, and could easily start for a mid-table team. But if we're bringing in Yedlin, he'll need to go.
 

$hoguN

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
26,672
34,817
I'd also be sad to see Naughton go - he's been with us a fair while, and is one of the better back-up RBs in the league, and could easily start for a mid-table team. But if we're bringing in Yedlin, he'll need to go.

Sorry mate, but he is not one of the better right back in the league. The lad is very average. I obviously wish him luck in the future, but we need to move him on to create opportunities for younger players, much in the same way we need to move on players like Jenas and Defoe imo
 

XSuicideBunnyX

FM Champion 2015
Aug 3, 2013
839
1,191
Sorry mate, but he is not one of the better right back in the league. The lad is very average. I obviously wish him luck in the future, but we need to move him on to create opportunities for younger players, much in the same way we need to move on players like Jenas and Defoe imo
One of the better back-ups = average starter

I agree that we need to get rid, but he clearly works hard and seems like a nice fella from social media. I'm really looking forward to seeing what Yedlin can bring in his role. Much more Walker-lite than Naughton is.
 

dovahkiin

Damn you're ugly !
May 18, 2012
3,343
89,323
more from ali z, sounds a bit like summing up paper rumours but anyway: As for players out a few clubs have enquired about Soldado, none on Ade, a firm bid place for Lamela (not accepted) interest in two mentioned plus Townsend and Pauli, none in Kaboom or Capoue.
 

steve

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2003
3,503
1,767
Parker i'll give you without doubt but I doubt Pinky considers him old guard. Huddlestone and Livermore I don't agree with, both were short on quality and Tom wasn't big on tenacity most of the time.

A big squad overhaul was always gonna cause issues but the process started by AVB and being continued by Poch in terms of mentality is the right one. We may have bought badly in terms of mentality but suggesting we may have faired better with the likes of the two you mention is wide of the mark.

We needed a strong manager with personality and crucially the board standing firm and backing his decisions to the hilt. Thankfully that's started to happen.
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
Parker i'll give you without doubt but I doubt Pinky considers him old guard. Huddlestone and Livermore I don't agree with, both were short on quality and Tom wasn't big on tenacity most of the time.

A big squad overhaul was always gonna cause issues but the process started by AVB and being continued by Poch in terms of mentality is the right one. We may have bought badly in terms of mentality but suggesting we may have faired better with the likes of the two you mention is wide of the mark.

We needed a strong manager with personality and crucially the board standing firm and backing his decisions to the hilt. Thankfully that's started to happen.

The question is not quality, but rather mentality. I agree that on paper players such as Paulinho and Capoue looked better at the time than Thudd and Livermore, but it was the combination of so many loose parts without a core that led to our demise. I think we should have sold one, but not both. I'd absolutely have kept Livermore as he was clearly on an upward trajectory, proven himself a Prem-capable player, and I think absolutely would have fared better than Capoue has done. I think we allowed it so early because Poch retained hope of bringing in Schneiderlin and had yet to fully assess Capoue. As is, we got a bit unlucky with Sandro not being fully fit (of course), Schneiderlin not working out, and finally Capoue falling out of the fold for whatever reason.

So while I don't suggest we would have fared better had we kept both of them, I do think we've seen the evidence of what happens when you completely disregard squad mentality and chemistry for the sake of adding quality on paper. We have given far too little consideration to these respects, as well as compatibility, with too much towards potential and quality and as a result we have suffered for it. We've only just now turned it around, or else the Spurs Chat section would still be flooded with comments pertaining to it.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,176
100,403
With all due respect Pinky, Park was a talented squad player with a tremendous attitude, never (allegedly) complained, would dip in and out of the team almost seamlessly when called upon and worked his balls off on and off the ball. I don't think Lennon has ever been in that bracket even in his more exciting formative years.

I used to defend him but outside of the (pinch of salt) ITK, a big earner and sporadic performer with an alleged questionable attitude isn't what we need. I'm glad the old guard have been moved on (Daws, Defoe, Hudd, Keane, soon to be BAE) as they represented a talented but flawed group of individuals and thankfully Poch (and other managers before him) are only interested in those who are willing to embrace his way of hard work on and off the pitch. ANY senior player who doesn't embrace that should be moved on if possible as soon as possible.

I was hoping that he'd mature under the right guidance, and become a very useful squad option for us - not just making up the numbers because he's been here for a decade.

That's my take anyway.
 

0-Tibsy-0

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
11,350
44,183
more from ali z, sounds a bit like summing up paper rumours but anyway: As for players out a few clubs have enquired about Soldado, none on Ade, a firm bid place for Lamela (not accepted) interest in two mentioned plus Townsend and Pauli, none in Kaboom or Capoue.

Thank fuck.

He will tear this league up when he finally gets up his best.

Optimistic perhaps...
But I have such high hopes for this guy that I'm glad it doesnt seem like we are entertaining any idea of selling him before his full quality has been shown...
 

steve

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2003
3,503
1,767
The question is not quality, but rather mentality. I agree that on paper players such as Paulinho and Capoue looked better at the time than Thudd and Livermore, but it was the combination of so many loose parts without a core that led to our demise. I think we should have sold one, but not both. I'd absolutely have kept Livermore as he was clearly on an upward trajectory, proven himself a Prem-capable player, and I think absolutely would have fared better than Capoue has done. I think we allowed it so early because Poch retained hope of bringing in Schneiderlin and had yet to fully assess Capoue. As is, we got a bit unlucky with Sandro not being fully fit (of course), Schneiderlin not working out, and finally Capoue falling out of the fold for whatever reason.

So while I don't suggest we would have fared better had we kept both of them, I do think we've seen the evidence of what happens when you completely disregard squad mentality and chemistry for the sake of adding quality on paper. We have given far too little consideration to these respects, as well as compatibility, with too much towards potential and quality and as a result we have suffered for it. We've only just now turned it around, or else the Spurs Chat section would still be flooded with comments pertaining to it.

Livermore has a decent mentality and would make a useful squad player and I agree the mentality hasn't been right but I think it was less to do with who we shipped out and more to do with who we brought in from a mentality point of view. We lost Bale remember, just having him on the pitch was massive in every regard.

I don't think Livermore is as good as you make out, I liked him, but he was a jack of all trades master of none and his mentality wasn't enough to make up for this. I also think he wanted regular footy which he wasn't gonna get at Spurs.

We need a squad of hungry, talented footballers and anyone who doesn't fulfill that should be moved on if possible. I'll give you Huddlestone was hungry but not in the way you mention.
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
Thank fuck.

He will tear this league up when he finally gets up his best.

Optimistic perhaps...
But I have such high hopes for this guy that I'm glad it doesnt seem like we are entertaining any idea of selling him before his full quality has been shown...

I like the player and hope you're right, but I'd be surprised to see us turn down an offer over 20 mil that the player would be interested in. Good offer for a player who seems to still struggle with the physicality of the Premier League, and would certainly help with making other additions/a replacement. We're also snug tight up against the non-HG limit, so if Poch wants other players more compatible with his system elsewhere, I could see him being amenable to the idea.

I don't want him out mind you, just think it's possible.
 

Greenspur

Very old member
Sep 1, 2004
2,681
3,090
Agree entirely with Poch that that goal was Lennon's fault. Absolutely no question, and Lennon should have done better homework. I'm from fucking Alabama and I know Hazard loves give and go's into the box. You absolutely cannot allow him to run freely after making a short pass right behind you into the box.

As for relevance, I agree and I do hope we manage to part ways. Lennon has been a caricature of himself ever since AVB flipped him and Bale, and I think he could use a change in scenery. Much obliged to him for his servitude over a very long period of time, but our system has moved on and now so should he.

The fact he didn't accept criticism for that goal really irks me. We were doing so well up until that point.

Surely, even Alabama has outlawed servitude?
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
Livermore has a decent mentality and would make a useful squad player and I agree the mentality hasn't been right but I think it was less to do with who we shipped out and more to do with who we brought in from a mentality point of view. We lost Bale remember, just having him on the pitch was massive in every regard.

I don't think Livermore is as good as you make out, I liked him, but he was a jack of all trades master of none and his mentality wasn't enough to make up for this. I also think he wanted regular footy which he wasn't gonna get at Spurs.

We need a squad of hungry, talented footballers and anyone who doesn't fulfill that should be moved on if possible. I'll give you Huddlestone was hungry but not in the way you mention.

When did I say Huddlestone was hungry? I don't think he was ever hungry for improvement, but he did provided solidity. Nonetheless, I'd have sold him as we did. Was simply not quick enough for what we needed per our own aspirations.

I also never said Livermore was particular quality, but I rather said that I think he'd have fared better than his replacement has. I stand by that remark, and especially because of that inclusion of mentality upgrade. It's no coincidence he was never turned over by anyone, and his replacements were crushed relentlessly by the top sides in the league last season.

Bale was a massive loss and that absence entirely killed our offensive flow, but I don't think he was as vital to our mentality as was say Parker. He inspired belief, but not resolve against the odds and will to fight.
 

steve

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2003
3,503
1,767
When did I say Huddlestone was hungry? I don't think he was ever hungry for improvement, but he did provided solidity. Nonetheless, I'd have sold him as we did. Was simply not quick enough for what we needed per our own aspirations.

I also never said Livermore was particular quality, but I rather said that I think he'd have fared better than his replacement has. I stand by that remark, and especially because of that inclusion of mentality upgrade. It's no coincidence he was never turned over by anyone, and his replacements were crushed relentlessly by the top sides in the league last season.

Bale was a massive loss and that absence entirely killed our offensive flow, but I don't think he was as vital to our mentality as was say Parker. He inspired belief, but not resolve against the odds and will to fight.

Livermore didn't play in the team that got mauled on occasion last season. Do you think he'd have made any difference?

So outside of Parker who we agree on (but was past his best) who else in terms of old school players did we miss? Who would've made the difference in terms of mentality? Outside of the obvious ones (King, VDV)?
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
Livermore didn't play in the team that got mauled on occasion last season. Do you think he'd have made any difference?

So outside of Parker who we agree on (but was past his best) who else in terms of old school players did we miss? Who would've made the difference in terms of mentality? Outside of the obvious ones (King, VDV)?

That's exactly my point that Livermore wasn't there, and yes I think he would've. I don't think he'd have changed the results as they were marked in the table, but I do think he would have at least prevented the capitulations.

So other than Parker (and I agree he was certainly past his best, I don't fault us for replacing him but I fault us for entirely removing that core without any replacements with mind towards mentality), I'd have kept Livermore and would have tried to keep Daws over Kaboul. I think he'd have stayed to fight for a place and rotate with the squad, and couldn't have done any worse than Kaboul did earlier this season. Add the additional mentality and leadership contribution, and it's no question for me.
 

TheAmerican

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2012
6,913
18,761
more from ali z, sounds a bit like summing up paper rumours but anyway: As for players out a few clubs have enquired about Soldado, none on Ade, a firm bid place for Lamela (not accepted) interest in two mentioned plus Townsend and Pauli, none in Kaboom or Capoue.
I have a feeling that both Kaboul and Ade will sit out their contracts. BAE parts 2 & 3.
 

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
Since Paulinho is mentioned in ITK today....

Goodbye Little Paul
Though I never knew you at all
You had the grace to hold yourself
While those around you missed the ball
You shot it in the woodwork
And they whispered around the lane
They set you on the treadmill
And they hardly sung yourname

chorus:
And it seems to me you played your game
Like a candle in the wind
Never knowing who to cling to
When the rain set in
And I would have liked to have known you
But I was just a fan
At Spurs you burned out long before
Your potential wasn't common lore

Box-to-box was tough
The toughest role you ever played
Transfer news created a superstar
And pain was the price you paid
Even when you scored
Oh the fans still hounded you
All the papers had to say
Was that Paulinho hit a fluke

(repeat chorus)

Goodbye Little Paul
Though I never knew you at all
You had the grace to hold yourself
While those around missed the ball
Goodbye Paulinho
From the young man in the 22nd row
Who sees you as something more than failure
More than just our half of a Brazilian
 

steve

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2003
3,503
1,767
That's exactly my point that Livermore wasn't there, and yes I think he would've. I don't think he'd have changed the results as they were marked in the table, but I do think he would have at least prevented the capitulations.

So other than Parker (and I agree he was certainly past his best, I don't fault us for replacing him but I fault us for entirely removing that core without any replacements with mind towards mentality), I'd have kept Livermore and would have tried to keep Daws over Kaboul. I think he'd have stayed to fight for a place and rotate with the squad, and couldn't have done any worse than Kaboul did earlier this season. Add the additional mentality and leadership contribution, and it's no question for me.

Dawson was here last season during those capitulations. And in previous ones.

I don't agree re Livermore at all, decent, puts himself about but he's at Hull for a reason along with Huddlestone and Dawson fighting relegation. We'd have been better against the likes of Liverpool? Conjecture with little evidence to back it up.

Going back to Pinky's lament about the last of the old guard going I think it was more a nostalgic look at times past (which I understand) and a point towards the clubs long servers such as Daws, Hudd, Lennon, and Defoe. Can't say I miss or will miss any of them from a footballing or mentality point of view.

Players with a strong mentality and very good technical ability are pretty rare and not easy to find at the prices and wages we're willing to pay. Like I said I agree I think the players we brought in have lacked a strong mentality but I think it's fair to say we lacked it before then and if Jake Livermore was the difference then we really were in trouble. He wasn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top