- Aug 21, 2014
- 9,799
- 27,110
His mum.
Keep up!
That's what she said.
His mum.
Keep up!
Is @aquanard your Mum?Its like my mums face when she caught me wanking.
it was blocked until i changed server- feck l wish l didn't see it!!!!!!Cannot be unseen
Fucking gooners.
WTF does this even mean?
The home tie against Spu*s ended in a joke 1-1,
That gem came from one of their mods. I could understand if they had 5 goals disallowed for off side or soemthing but 1-1 was a fair result, unless he considers any draw against us to be a joke which would then just point to him being a ****
we've got that extra quality that Spurs haven't
WTF does this even mean?
The home tie against Spu*s ended in a joke 1-1,
That gem came from one of their mods. I could understand if they had 5 goals disallowed for off side or soemthing but 1-1 was a fair result, unless he considers any draw against us to be a joke which would then just point to him being a ****
Over to you, Messrs Kane and Eriksen.
Shove those words back down this twat's fat gob.
You'd obviously jump at £50 million
£50 million would eclipse the record for an English player and theres no guarantee Kane can repeat the goalscoring next season. It would obviously be madness to turn it down
But it's proven so hard for Spurs to sign a striker capable of scoring 20+ goals per season. What good would £50 million do them? They've proven already how hard it is to reinvest money. It's easy to spend big money if you pay big wages, as you can buy the best players. The wages they pay mean they wont be able to get anyone top class.
You sell Carrick and end up with Zokora.
You sell Berbatov and you end up with Pavlyuchenko.
You sell Modric and end up with Dembele.
You sell Bale and end up with Lamela.
I can't see £50 million being a great incentive for them. For other clubs it would be totally different. For example, if Chelsea could get £50 million for a player like Kane, they should take it instantly as they'd be able to bring in someone much better. Or alternatively, as club like Aston Villa would be able to rebuild their team with £50 million, as they are pretty rubbish all over. But for Spurs, who aren't short of money anyway, to reinvest £50 million from Kane and improve as a result, is actually surprisingly difficult
I think I just found the most level headed Man Utd fan in the world...
if Chelsea could get £50 million for a player like Kane, they should take it instantly as they'd be able to bring in someone much better.
Damn, for a split second I thought we'd signed Messi
Lol they talk about beating us being the start to their title challenge and we talk about it being our serious top 4 challenge. Same old and neither will happen. Let's just smash them.