To beat off the competition. This is very interesting.
Ings only goes to tribunal if Burnley can't agree a fee for him (normal free agent rules don't apply to U23s). If we go in with an offer, another club has to match that.
We're simply gazumping Liverpool and the others
I'l back JJ any day, his record is outstanding
And JJ has been spot on more times than I care to remember. We all know things can and often do change but in this instance I choose to go with what he says.
I doubt this will happen due to the sell on fee that Man City have on Trippier.Ah - looking at the Independent today, seems there is a Levy-style way these two come together: buy Trippier and get Ings on a "free" (but overpay on Trippier). Sounds familiar somehow... Maybe not 100% dead deal.
Yep, especially when he commits to something. quiet often he is vague so you know when he is sure on something, it's happening.
JJ gives us the latest he knows. Sometimes even that changes. I fully believe JJ when he said that "Ings is going elsewhere", but what if Liverpool have been alerted to another target? etc, etc, etc
Listing what players there is no information on is a dangerous game in here.
Sky do have a history of making things up... they seem to own the transfer window and SkyBet where there are markets on players.
Or it's true. Who knows.
Yep, especially when he commits to something. quiet often he is vague so you know when he is sure on something, it's happening.
No, but surely the other way round is feasible. Overpay on Ings, so City get little money from the Trippier deal.I doubt this will happen due to the sell on fee that Man City have on Trippier.