What's new

Standing still while rivals improve

ebzrascal

Well-Known Member
Sep 13, 2009
2,635
4,670

ginola99

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2005
684
1,425
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/pre...tables/premier-league-table-last-five-seasons

Shows the amount of money spent by every current premier league club over the past 5 years, and ranks the clubs from 1 (most spent) to 20 (least spent). We are 19th.

Goes to show how expensive this stadium is!

I'm doing a masters in Town Planning atm and did a Development Finance module earlier this year, we were tasked with building on a plot in London and the costs were eye watering and on a knife's edge.

A stadium is no different.
 

Hoops

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2015
3,650
6,363
I'm doing a masters in Town Planning atm and did a Development Finance module earlier this year, we were tasked with building on a plot in London and the costs were eye watering and on a knife's edge.

A stadium is no different.

BREAKING NEWS...London real estate expensive says Town Planner.










:woot:;)
 

Flashspur

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2012
6,883
9,069
You only have to look at the stats to tell how much of a difference he makes. Have a go if you like, but with respect maybe you don't really understand the game all that well. Dembele makes a massive difference because he creates space and opportunities for our attacking players further up the pitch. He's virtually impossible to win the ball back from, and he carries it into spaces that allow a simple pass to be dangerous.

Sorry if you don't get that!

Missing the point completely. I am not arguing that he does not change things. The point is that we are totally reliant on one player to change our game around. That is bloody foolhardy if not risky considering we have CL on top of the PL and are competing in both to win.

And don't be condescending dude. I've been watching football at WHL and other places since 1960 and seen a lot more football than you I wager. I think I understand the game pretty fricken' well.
 

Spurger King

can't smile without glue
Jul 22, 2008
43,881
95,149
Missing the point completely. I am not arguing that he does not change things. The point is that we are totally reliant on one player to change our game around. That is bloody foolhardy if not risky considering we have CL on top of the PL and are competing in both to win.

And don't be condescending dude. I've been watching football at WHL and other places since 1960 and seen a lot more football than you I wager. I think I understand the game pretty fricken' well.

Apologies for the condescending tone. Completely unnecessary on my part. I was in a foul mood at the time and generally being a bit of a twat for no good reason.

I agree. It's not good to be so reliant upon one player. Unfortunately he's a pretty unique type of player. What we need is a solid plan B when he's not available.
 

Flashspur

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2012
6,883
9,069
Apologies for the condescending tone. Completely unnecessary on my part. I was in a foul mood at the time and generally being a bit of a twat for no good reason.

I agree. It's not good to be so reliant upon one player. Unfortunately he's a pretty unique type of player. What we need is a solid plan B when he's not available.

No probs (y)
 

ethanedwards

Snowflake incarnate.
Nov 24, 2006
3,379
2,502
I really disagree mate sorry.

The only players from that list id take to swap in would be: Hazard, Coutiniho, Mane(you missed him out),possibly Sanchez and KDB and also Mikataryen(You also missed him out). That having said last year Eriksen and Alli scored and assisted in the top 5 midfielders in fact I think only Marhez and Ozil were better. It's also about find the right player, I don't think many of the above you've mentioned would actually be that good a fit for our system however the ones I've listed probably would.

You could also easily flip this around and say that how many of the top teams would take most of our back 4, dembele and Kane.

So it's apples and oranges mate, yes some of the top teams have some outstanding individual players but we have a very effective TEAM which Leicester proved is what wins things.

The issue is twofold, 1 we've not clicked into gear yet and a lot of our players who were excellent last year are under par so far, especially the attacking ones and n.o 2 we still lack a little bit of pace in our front 3 which makes transitioning difficult.

Also we have played Everton, Liverpool(who battered Arsenal away!) and c.palace, not exactly the easiest start compared to the current top3.
Let's just wait and see as the season progresses shall we. I do worry about our slightly lack of goal scoringthreat at the moment though.

The only players we could really get to improve us would cost £50mil + and be on mega wages which given were funding a spanking new stadium we cannot commit to those signings now.

So be patient with the team we have.

One other thing is I actually think Potch needs to have a little look at his tactics as against Liverpool this year and Dortmund last year I think we were actually outplayed but also tactically got it slightly wrong.

The team and manager are still learning. We won't win the league this year I just hope we can scrape top 4 and build from there + Mabye have a good CL run and win a cup.

COYS.

Perspective please people!!
If you don't believe David Silva would improve us, bloody hell.
 

am_yisrael_chai

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2006
6,409
10,931
I really disagree mate sorry.

The only players from that list id take to swap in would be: Hazard, Coutiniho, Mane(you missed him out),possibly Sanchez and KDB and also Mikataryen(You also missed him out). That having said last year Eriksen and Alli scored and assisted in the top 5 midfielders in fact I think only Marhez and Ozil were better. It's also about find the right player, I don't think many of the above you've mentioned would actually be that good a fit for our system however the ones I've listed probably would.

You could also easily flip this around and say that how many of the top teams would take most of our back 4, dembele and Kane.

So it's apples and oranges mate, yes some of the top teams have some outstanding individual players but we have a very effective TEAM which Leicester proved is what wins things.

The issue is twofold, 1 we've not clicked into gear yet and a lot of our players who were excellent last year are under par so far, especially the attacking ones and n.o 2 we still lack a little bit of pace in our front 3 which makes transitioning difficult.

Also we have played Everton, Liverpool(who battered Arsenal away!) and c.palace, not exactly the easiest start compared to the current top3.
Let's just wait and see as the season progresses shall we. I do worry about our slightly lack of goal scoringthreat at the moment though.

The only players we could really get to improve us would cost £50mil + and be on mega wages which given were funding a spanking new stadium we cannot commit to those signings now.

So be patient with the team we have.

One other thing is I actually think Potch needs to have a little look at his tactics as against Liverpool this year and Dortmund last year I think we were actually outplayed but also tactically got it slightly wrong.

The team and manager are still learning. We won't win the league this year I just hope we can scrape top 4 and build from there + Mabye have a good CL run and win a cup.

COYS.

Perspective please people!!
No need to apologise it's about different opinions. Quite frankly I'm staggered you wouldn't take Willian and would only possibly take KdB and Sanchez. That strikes me of very Spurs tinted spectacles. Ignoring the others I think the vast majority of fans would pick a 3 of Willian/Sanchez/KdB over Eriksen/Ali/Lamela. In fact I'd go so far as to say that if you gave us those 3 in place of our current 3 we would most likely win the league.
 

am_yisrael_chai

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2006
6,409
10,931
True, but we were close to signing all of those Chelsea ones before they played their favourite game of gazumping us. We also had a deal in place for Martial before United said they'd pay nearly 3 times as much as we'd agreed. We are at a level where in order to improve our first team they are the players we need to be targeting (and we do) but they also happen to be the same players that the clubs that pay 2-3 times as much in wages as we can afford have on their shopping lists.
That's fine but it can't mean we buy nobody we should be competing with the next tier of clubs in Dortmund and Athletico. Just look at the young talent Dortmund purchased this summer.
 

Xeeleeyid

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2012
1,693
3,186
I haven't read through all the posts in this thread, but these kind of sentiments do my nut in. We've always been relatively tight in recent years, we've always looked for a bargain under Levy. We've rarely signed players for the sake of signing players.

Yet are we standing still while rivals improve? We've finished pretty much consistently top 5 bar one or two seasons and last season we finished 3rd, our highest ever PL finish. So surely we are the ones improving while others are standing still?

Even in the transfer market, our first XI was very hard to improve on. To improve on any position in the XI from last year would require a monster-level player, like a Pogba. What was obviously lacking was DM cover for Dier and CF cover for Kane. Both were secured with good signings early on.

The rest of this window therefore has been an exercise in only needing to buy if the right player is available at the right price. There is no need IMO for any further signings, particularly due to the quality coming through the youth academy.

Which brings me onto the 3rd point about why we're improving while rivals are standing still. We have the best youth academy and training facilities, possibly in world football. Or it's got to be up there at least in terms of facilities. We are also building a brand new world-class FOOTBALL stadium. These infrastructure improvements are developing the club hugely off the pitch, but people like to forget about this.
 

Xeeleeyid

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2012
1,693
3,186
Missing the point completely. I am not arguing that he does not change things. The point is that we are totally reliant on one player to change our game around. That is bloody foolhardy if not risky considering we have CL on top of the PL and are competing in both to win.

And don't be condescending dude. I've been watching football at WHL and other places since 1960 and seen a lot more football than you I wager. I think I understand the game pretty fricken' well.

We're not "totally" reliant on one player. We have got acceptable results in our first 3 games without him. Draw away at Goodison will not be sniffed at this season, neither will a point against Liverpool. We beat Palace, should have beaten them by more.

BUT, he does make a big difference. It's not foolhardy to only have one Dembele type player because how many of them are there out there? Just as Man U's midfield starts to look pretty mundane and one-dimensional if you took Pogba out of it, Man City used to struggle and have struggled badly to replace Yaya Toure.

Being without your top players affects any club, not just us. If you're as good as Dembele you're not going to come to Spurs to sit on the bench. Hence why you can't generally have back-ups that are as good as your first XI.
 

TheHood

.................................
Jan 17, 2006
1,671
2,104
That's fine but it can't mean we buy nobody we should be competing with the next tier of clubs in Dortmund and Athletico. Just look at the young talent Dortmund purchased this summer.

And they sold 3 of their best players for a combined £90 million to do that.I take it you're not advocating us doing that are you?.
 
Last edited:

TH1239

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
3,693
8,964
I haven't read through all the posts in this thread, but these kind of sentiments do my nut in. We've always been relatively tight in recent years, we've always looked for a bargain under Levy. We've rarely signed players for the sake of signing players.

Yet are we standing still while rivals improve? We've finished pretty much consistently top 5 bar one or two seasons and last season we finished 3rd, our highest ever PL finish. So surely we are the ones improving while others are standing still?

Even in the transfer market, our first XI was very hard to improve on. To improve on any position in the XI from last year would require a monster-level player, like a Pogba. What was obviously lacking was DM cover for Dier and CF cover for Kane. Both were secured with good signings early on.

The rest of this window therefore has been an exercise in only needing to buy if the right player is available at the right price. There is no need IMO for any further signings, particularly due to the quality coming through the youth academy.

Which brings me onto the 3rd point about why we're improving while rivals are standing still. We have the best youth academy and training facilities, possibly in world football. Or it's got to be up there at least in terms of facilities. We are also building a brand new world-class FOOTBALL stadium. These infrastructure improvements are developing the club hugely off the pitch, but people like to forget about this.

You do realize we have just sold Chadli (made 40 appearances last season for us), and that Njie is essentially out the door too, right? You also realize Wolfsburg have made a bid for Son and he may be off, right? You still think we don't need to sign anyone if all those deals are completed? You have complete faith that Onomah/Winks/Nkoudou can be strong attacking midfield cover for Alli/Eriksen/Lamela and that Poch will freely rotate the former into numerous CL and PL matches with no adverse effect?
 

ebzrascal

Well-Known Member
Sep 13, 2009
2,635
4,670
I really can`t believe what we are doing especially with Champions League football.. If we end up selling Bentaleb, Mason, Chadli and Son that would be totally crazy unless we get better replacements in which does not look guaranteed.. is this more about Levy raising money? If this goes wrong and we are embarrassed in the Champions League and our League position ends up being poor I think the reaction of the fans will be toxic...
 

slartibartfast

Grunge baby forever
Oct 21, 2012
18,320
33,955
We're not "totally" reliant on one player. We have got acceptable results in our first 3 games without him. Draw away at Goodison will not be sniffed at this season, neither will a point against Liverpool. We beat Palace, should have beaten them by more.

BUT, he does make a big difference. It's not foolhardy to only have one Dembele type player because how many of them are there out there? Just as Man U's midfield starts to look pretty mundane and one-dimensional if you took Pogba out of it, Man City used to struggle and have struggled badly to replace Yaya Toure.

Being without your top players affects any club, not just us. If you're as good as Dembele you're not going to come to Spurs to sit on the bench. Hence why you can't generally have back-ups that are as good as your first XI.
Good post.
Also the bench wouldnt look as weak with Vorm, Wanyama and Janssen sat on it which is where they'll be when Lloris, Walker and Dembele are fit.
Total OTT reaction to a draw with Liverpool by some who seem to have forgotten we started worse than this last season and at this stage, just 3 games in, everyone was still betting on the usual suspects to get top 4.
How did that work out in the end?
Chill :cool:
 

slartibartfast

Grunge baby forever
Oct 21, 2012
18,320
33,955
I should add I do think that having a massive chunk of whl missing and playing CL at Wembley probably isn't going to help much performance wise this season.
Just remember it'll be worth it (fat chance of that :facepalm:)
 

Amo

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2013
15,799
31,490
Well aint you just a ray of sunshine lol.
We're not Man U, Citae or Chelski and never have been.
We CANNOT compete with their finances so why get upset when we don't?

I'm not saying we should compete with Man U, Citae and Chelski.

I'm saying we should compete with Crystal Palace.
 

THOWIG

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2005
6,522
8,424
The future is our academy. Buy and invest in the best young players in the game and leave the rest to blow 90mil on a player.
 
Top