- Jun 18, 2011
- 6,452
- 17,191
He's not quite as marketable as Klopp to be fair
Doesn't change the fact that Poch has more class in his glorious stubble hair than Klopp could ever dream of having.
He's not quite as marketable as Klopp to be fair
Technically he's right, they are equal points.I know we think that Liverpool have dropped into third behind us, but, according to RAWK, that's not actually the case.
The true position, as one poster put it, is that Liverpool are now...
"5 points clear of the most expensive squad ever assembled, and equal with 2nd place"
Technically he's right, they are equal points.
Technically he's incorrect as they have an inferior goal difference. Therefore, not equal.
But he's talking about points. Otherwise he can't prove his point
He said "equal with second" implying they are equal with another team. If he meant they were in 2nd - he would have said "we are 2nd"Technically he's incorrect as they have an inferior goal difference. Therefore, not equal.
He said "equal with second" implying they are equal with another team. If he meant they were in 2nd - he would have said "we are 2nd"
They are equal on points - goal differential really means nothing until the end of the season.
You'd never see Poch doing an advert for face cream or gambling like that prick Klopp does.
The goal difference means they are currently in third, that is "technically" correct which was my point in the first place.
They didn't say they weren't 3rd and the fact that the said equal with 2nd is an acknowledgement that they aren't 2nd.The goal difference means they are currently in third, that is "technically" correct which was my point in the first place.
They didn't say they weren't 3rd and the fact that the said equal with 2nd is an acknowledgement that they aren't 2nd.
I hate Liverpool and their fans too but scraping the barrel to try and find traces of delusion and/or arrogance is pathetic and completely unnecessary given the amount of ammo they provide every week.
Points didn't need to be mentioned as that is what first decides league placing, so it's implied.Points weren't mentioned. The poster said they're "equal second."
They're not, that's why they have a 3 by their name, because they have an inferior goal difference...
I love using the word "inferior" when talking about that pond scum.
Points didn't need to be mentioned as that is what first decides league placing, so it's implied.
He said "equal with second" implying they are equal with another team. If he meant they were in 2nd - he would have said "we are 2nd"
They are equal on points - goal differential really means nothing until the end of the season.
meh - there is enough to laugh about when it comes to Liverpool and their full-kit wankers, this does not even register.But they're not equal with second in the eyes of the league table, they're third.
No such fucking thing as equal second.
If the Clubs positions were reversed as it is now, do you think said fan would be saying they're equal second, or just second.
#rhetorical
Agree, but its a completely typical remark imo, absolute bin lidsmeh - there is enough to laugh about when it comes to Liverpool and their full-kit wankers, this does not even register.