What's new

Vincent Janssen

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
Patrik Schick. And yes, i know about the 'heart issue'. due diligence suggests we should at least check into it. If it is arrhythmia that is amenable to ablative therapy (like I believe Clint Dempsey had) then he could be gotten for cheap with limited risk. If it is something more serious then we just leave it alone. But this kid ticks all the boxes otherwise and he was more than interested in sitting the bench at Juve. He's got mobility, good pace, link-up play, and finishing. Considering Juve were getting him for 26M it could be a goer. Yes, I know Samp says that clause has ended but we should look into it. Even if true his price has had to drop considering the 'health scare'.

I was just mentioning a name. I want Janssen to stay as I think he has something and I like an underdog story.

That's seen as a risk signing, we would't go anywhere near him.
 

St José Dominguez

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2014
3,592
11,648
Not really. I already listed one and here are another two: Davie Selke and lukasz Teodorcyk (sp?). Saw Selke in his Bremen days and thought there might be something to him. And he played well for Germany in the Euros this summer. Teodorcyk I first saw this year for Anderlecht and wonder how in the frick Dinamo Kiev let him go out on loan as they were shit and he looks promising. Top scorer in Belgium this year (i believe) and before you say "yeah, but that is Belgium" just remember Gent kicked our asses and Anderlecht almost did. Both of these players are light years beyond Janssen on the athletic charts (not a great feat). Both bring significantly higher aerial threat and are better facing the goal and with the ball at their feet.

There is also Jovetic but he has injury issues it seems though he did look good for Sevilla. Would Barca deal Paco Alcacer? There was Sandro Ramirez for 6M that Everton gobbled up and has looked pretty good for them...that we could have gotten on a free last year and reportedly wanted to come to us!?!?!?!?!?! And that's only scratching the surface. It particularly easy if one watches more than the PL.

You say it's particularly easy if one watches more than the PL yet that's all you can come up with?

Selke is unproven, sure he might be a star and you can give self a pat on the back but signing him would be a punt. The polish striker (who I'm guessing has had injury issues as only started 6 league games in the 2 years prior) had a top scoring season in Belgian league, he's 26, yet he's certain of being a hit ahead of a 21 yr old top scorer in Holland.

Alcacer cost Barca 30m euro a year ago, he's 23 and he won't leave Barca after a year what with an aging Suarez in team.

Sandro must be on big money because Everton signed him without much competition. He left Barca to get first team football there's not a chance he'd have come to be backup to Kane, he may as well have stayed at Barca if didn't care about being first choice.

And finally a guy with heart issues causing Juve to pull out of signing him who'd cost massive money at a time when we've got little money.

Still not seen a single suggestion of a) someone attainable and properly proven at high level b) happy to be backup on likely 70k a week c) much more than a 50/50 chance of actually being a success.
 

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
He'd played one season in the Dutch first division. Before that was playing at a level comparable to league 3, or even non league. Hardly what you could call accomplished - he was a punt.
Yes yes yes, I understand that you hold an insatiable need to talk down a Spurs player who has done nothing to deserve the raging level of underestimation from fans. A young, cheap (for the current market) player who has showed definite signs of improvements. Let's take yet another chance at talking him down. :poop:
 
Last edited:

thebenjamin

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2008
12,270
38,973
Yes yes yes, I understand that you hold an insatiable need to talk down a Spurs players who has done nothing to deserve the raging level of underestimation from fans. A young, cheap (for the current market) player who has showed definite signs of improvements. Let's take yet another chance at talking him down. :poop:


Calm down mate. You said he was an 'accomplished' player from a foreign league. Which he clearly isn't having only played one season in the top division of a league far weaker than England. You can't just say stuff that's fundamentally untrue and not expect people to pull you up on it.
 

heelspurs

Le filet mignon est un bastion de rosbif
Jul 25, 2012
4,270
5,105
We signed him on 12th July.
Ok, fair enough but there was a back and forth if I remember correctly. Evidently most of that was in the month before the window opened and his delay lasted less than 2 weeks. But considering that most that saw his clips concluded he needed fitness and agility/speed work to succeed that 2 weeks was vital in the early season. It's about putting players in positions to succeed and not struggle from the off.
 

heelspurs

Le filet mignon est un bastion de rosbif
Jul 25, 2012
4,270
5,105
That's seen as a risk signing, we would't go anywhere near him.
And youth signings aren't? If you wouldn't go near him without actually knowing what the issue is I would not consider that responsible. Good player that by all mean we should have been interested in at full price but one party says unfit and another says he is fine. As the chairman of a lesser moneyed team trying to compete with moneyed clubs I would consider it a dereliction of duty not to investigate it. That is why you do your due diligence and that would include a full cardiology workup to assess the risk and potential treatment (if nec). As Poch says we need to be 'clever' in the market. I wonder how much we regret not taking Moussa 2 because of reported knee concerns now.
 

heelspurs

Le filet mignon est un bastion de rosbif
Jul 25, 2012
4,270
5,105
You say it's particularly easy if one watches more than the PL yet that's all you can come up with?

Selke is unproven, sure he might be a star and you can give self a pat on the back but signing him would be a punt. The polish striker (who I'm guessing has had injury issues as only started 6 league games in the 2 years prior) had a top scoring season in Belgian league, he's 26, yet he's certain of being a hit ahead of a 21 yr old top scorer in Holland.

Alcacer cost Barca 30m euro a year ago, he's 23 and he won't leave Barca after a year what with an aging Suarez in team.

Sandro must be on big money because Everton signed him without much competition. He left Barca to get first team football there's not a chance he'd have come to be backup to Kane, he may as well have stayed at Barca if didn't care about being first choice.

And finally a guy with heart issues causing Juve to pull out of signing him who'd cost massive money at a time when we've got little money.

Still not seen a single suggestion of a) someone attainable and properly proven at high level b) happy to be backup on likely 70k a week c) much more than a 50/50 chance of actually being a success.
So much foolishness in this post. I won't hit all your 'points' as this post doesn't warrant a full response.

But do you really know how much 70k is a week? Do you understand that that is more that 95% of all European footballers make? Your perspective is warped. And any backup striker we get is not coming in on 70k. Dybala (f*cking Dybala) makes 90k euros (reported) on his new contract. FFS get some perspective.

Proven? Proven!!!??!!?? WTF? We don't buy proven. If they were proven they wouldn't be a backup and we couldn't afford them. Attainable and proven are diametrically opposed in our economic status. Ridiculous.

I never said Alcacer would leave. I asked would Barca get rid as there had been reports that they were unhappy. I asked a question, simple.

The point of my post is that there are players out there. People were saying that the peeps that were complaining about Janssen (me NOT being one of them) could not come up with other options. So I did. Simple.

Edit: clarifications
 

St José Dominguez

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2014
3,592
11,648
So much foolishness in this post. I won't hit all your 'points' as this post doesn't warrant a full response.

But do you really know how much 70k is a week? Do you understand that that is more that 95% of all European footballers make? Your perspective is warped. And any backup striker we get is not coming in on 70k. Dybala (f*cking Dybala) makes 90k euros (reported) on his new contract. FFS get some perspective.

Proven? Proven!!!??!!?? WTF? We don't buy proven. If they were proven they wouldn't be a backup and we couldn't afford them. Attainable and proven are diametrically opposed in our economic status. Ridiculous.

I never said Alcacer would leave. I asked would Barca get rid as there had been reports that they were unhappy. I asked a question, simple.

The point of my post is that there are players out there. People were saying that the peeps that were complaining about Janssen (me NOT being one of them) could not come up with other options. So I did. Simple.

Edit: clarifications

Love you too.
 

Cravenspurs

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2011
2,864
3,680
You say it's particularly easy if one watches more than the PL yet that's all you can come up with?

Selke is unproven, sure he might be a star and you can give self a pat on the back but signing him would be a punt. The polish striker (who I'm guessing has had injury issues as only started 6 league games in the 2 years prior) had a top scoring season in Belgian league, he's 26, yet he's certain of being a hit ahead of a 21 yr old top scorer in Holland.

Alcacer cost Barca 30m euro a year ago, he's 23 and he won't leave Barca after a year what with an aging Suarez in team.

Sandro must be on big money because Everton signed him without much competition. He left Barca to get first team football there's not a chance he'd have come to be backup to Kane, he may as well have stayed at Barca if didn't care about being first choice.

And finally a guy with heart issues causing Juve to pull out of signing him who'd cost massive money at a time when we've got little money.

Still not seen a single suggestion of a) someone attainable and properly proven at high level b) happy to be backup on likely 70k a week c) much more than a 50/50 chance of actually being a success.

Here's a suggestion...Bobby Wood. Been banging on this drum over and over, but adds pace, technique and would be cheap.



To keep my reply on target with this thread...Vince has cement feet. Dude can't control the ball for the life of him.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,614
205,275
There is more to a strikers game overall but ultimately they are judged on goals scored.
You'd think so, but here on SC, not so much. Pavlyuchenko got a dogs abuse on here and he had a pretty good goals to appearances ratio. I said much the same thing as you've done here but got told I was talking bollocks :(

Harry Kane didn't get Pav levels of abuse but a large number of people here on SC said they couldn't see him making it, much like what's happening here. Jansen may or may not be a success here, I hope he is, but I've no idea. Having said that, if you take the above into consideration, it's a pretty safe bet that despite the strong onions, nobody else really has a clue either :D
 

DCSPUR

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2005
3,918
5,415
Here's a suggestion...Bobby Wood. Been banging on this drum over and over, but adds pace, technique and would be cheap.



To keep my reply on target with this thread...Vince has cement feet. Dude can't control the ball for the life of him.

like him....not convinced by his finishing
 

heelspurs

Le filet mignon est un bastion de rosbif
Jul 25, 2012
4,270
5,105
You'd think so, but here on SC, not so much. Pavlyuchenko got a dogs abuse on here and he had a pretty good goals to appearances ratio. I said much the same thing as you've done here but got told I was talking bollocks :(

Harry Kane didn't get Pav levels of abuse but a large number of people here on SC said they couldn't see him making it, much like what's happening here. Jansen may or may not be a success here, I hope he is, but I've no idea. Having said that, if you take the above into consideration, it's a pretty safe bet that despite the strong onions, nobody else really has a clue either :D
TBF those may have just been reflexive responses to your posts :p
 

Ossie85

Rio de la Plata
Aug 2, 2008
3,924
13,230
People disagree with this. :ROFLMAO:
Some fans want so very much to see a player as a failure without nuances. Sickening, really.

Or some fans simply disagree with what you've said. Is that too hard to understand?

I haven't seen any improvement since the day he arrived. He's as useless as ever.

If you think he did, good for you. I think it's more wishful thinking than fact.

I have no petty desire to see him fail. I just don't think he's good enough.
I want the best for the team and right now I have more faith in Shayon Harrison being useful to the team in the long term than Janssen.
 

Krule

Carpe Diem
Jun 4, 2017
4,534
8,687
He showed, in absolute terms, improvement from his first appearances to his last appearances. If you count improvement only in number of goals, you'll miss how he really developed.

Please explain to me (and I suspect many others) what you mean by the expression 'in absolute terms' ?? The guy was brought in to score goals and hasn't...it was his first season so in goalscoring terms for Spurs he had nothing to 'improve' upon but was setting a standard to be compared to for future seasons. Please do not just type he has improved/developed since being with us....kindly enlighten me/us in what areas of play have you seen this ??
Surely that's not too much to ask....
 
Top