- Jun 8, 2004
- 8,752
- 17,012
Well, fuck it-should we go back in for Zaha?
Zaha is exciting but he lacks the end product we need now.
Well, fuck it-should we go back in for Zaha?
He has a little bit of end product, to be fair. As a player Poch was (and probably still is) an ardent admirer of, and one he had very specific plans for, would it not make your balls tingle to think what he (Poch, a world class coach) could do with him?Zaha is exciting but he lacks the end product we need now.
Has there been any ITK on this ?
Looking doubtful now due to others coming instead..
Pinch 'o' salt and all that
Not for the RO
Ok thanks for the hints. Things seem to be moving fast and on the assumption that we don't have all our eggs in one basket then our understanding is only as good as the last ITK or failing that hints from reliable sourcesLooking doubtful now due to others coming instead..
Pinch 'o' salt and all that
Not for the RO
Looking doubtful now due to others coming instead..
Pinch 'o' salt and all that
Not for the RO
Which suggests that we are closer to securing more primary targets - whoever they may be as I don't recall any other holding midfielders linked.Looking doubtful now due to others coming instead..
Pinch 'o' salt and all that
Not for the RO
Looking doubtful now due to others coming instead..
Pinch 'o' salt and all that
Not for the RO
Interesting. Thanks JJ.Looking doubtful now due to others coming instead..
Pinch 'o' salt and all that
Not for the RO
We're recalling Onomah?Looking doubtful now due to others coming instead..
Pinch 'o' salt and all that
Not for the RO
Excuse my possible stupidity, but can anyone clarify what RO means?Looking doubtful now due to others coming instead..
Pinch 'o' salt and all that
Not for the RO
Excuse my possible stupidity, but can anyone clarify what RO means?
Cheers.