What's new

Serge Aurier

Danners9

Available on a Free Transfer
Mar 30, 2004
14,018
20,807
When you say some fans you mean you! Other footballers like John Terry who are just as culpable in there behaviour and utterance are given a second chance without any fuss. Need to step off your high horse a bit.
Eh? I don't mean me at all. I have spoken completely objectively and not given my own opinion at all.

It says 'some.. others.. and others'. There are three separate positions there. No high horse at all. You're reading this wrong, I'm afraid.
 

diamond lights

active member
Aug 31, 2012
1,442
5,657
Can we all move on from Aurier's past indiscretions.

He's a young man that said some stupid things. He appears to be an enthusiastic, larger than life character and made mistakes.

He didn't kill anyone, support the Nazis or endanger anyone's life. He made some silly comments at age 23. I am nearly 50 and have heard far worse in many casual conversations.

If he signs Poch will be asked and he will say young men make mistakes, they apologise and learn lessons and move on.

Just let it go - he'll be a fantastic addition on the pitch. I think he could become a big favourite with his style of play.
 

spacessships

Incredibly Unknown Member
Jan 31, 2013
437
1,703
I enjoy some of this bloke's articles but, honestly, some of the hand-wringing over Aurier has been way, way over the top. Initially from the Americans at SB Nation, followed by a few others jumping on the bandwagon.

A kid - probably not a very well educated kid - did something dumb.

He issued an apology. Yet because he didn't specifically say precisely he was sorry for, these people want our club to dig it up again and publically drag him through some PR exercise?

It's a nonsense.

I would agree that there is a sensible discussion to be had here about academies doing more to educate kids who are - often due to socio-economic reasons - not very bright and in a bit of a macho bubble from a young age. But that's an issue for football as a whole, not just this one player.

I could offer a very cynical observation as to why a few of these bloggers have decided to latch on to this particular story and press it the way they have, but I honestly think everyone just needs to move on and give him the benefit of the doubt that he's learned from past mistakes.

Of course, if he repeats the same mistakes at Spurs then it's something we will need to deal with head-on.

It's hard to "move on" when Spurs fans react to his potential transfer like this and this and this and this and now even stalking a writer (who is not an American).

Is it overreacting if an LGBT fan doesn't feel safe to go to a Spurs game now? Or even speak their mind? And why are people jumping to defend Aurier before our own fans, he's not even kicked a ball for us yet?

The obvious thinking is "if it doesn't effect me, then no one else should care about it."

But after we've been linked with other RBs around the same price or even cheaper than Aurier, I don't see why it's such a crime to want one of them instead of a player who called his manager a "f*ggot" said he sucks Zlatan and "takes his whole balls" on social media three days before a R16 UCL match against Chelsea and then fakes an apology so poorly that Al-Kalaifi punched a door and multiple teammates wanted him off the squad. If it's okay to call Rose a snake after he says he wants to leave, I find it incredibly hypocritical to tell people they shouldn't have a problem with Aurier.

The fans are the reason the club continues to run, we may not be on the pitch or in the boardroom but without us there is no new stadium or £40m+ signing. Personally I'm proud we have fans writing articles and asking questions about how other fans may be impacted by the club's actions and wanting to keep us in check ethically. It's exactly what sets us apart from clubs like Chelski.

Bring on the negs and Come On You Spurs
 

spacessships

Incredibly Unknown Member
Jan 31, 2013
437
1,703
...I am nearly 50 and have heard far worse in many casual conversations...

I keep seeing this reasoning and rolling my eyes.

There is a big difference between a "casual conversation" as Joe-nobody (sorry but that's me too) and a social media broadcast as a public figure.

It's why the media has scheduled interviews after games and not cameras in the locker rooms. The managers and players need a place to speak freely without outside judgement. That information is not, and should not be made public. If they want to air their grievances publicly, there are better ways to do it.
 

Jody

SC Supporter
Sep 11, 2004
7,008
5,826
Good post. I personally was a bit quick to make light of his misdemeanors but that was probably down to my ignorance of what he's actually said and done. Personally don't feel I'm in a position to comment now but I do trust in Poch as someone of good character so him coming could mean one less homophobe shooting his mouth of in the future? Better he's here than the Chavs etc?
 

pennywise

Active Member
Feb 2, 2015
58
195
Does this actually make you cringe? Would someone with a past of racist offences apologising and trying to repair the damage be an offence to you as well?

If you and other Spurs-fans 'cringe' over the idea of someone like Aurier showing a bit of solidarity with a group of supporters who already struggle in the stands, then I think that's a much bigger problem than the believes and actions of individual players in the squad. Not any better than the Chavs.
 

diamond lights

active member
Aug 31, 2012
1,442
5,657
I keep seeing this reasoning and rolling my eyes.

There is a big difference between a "casual conversation" as Joe-nobody (sorry but that's me too) and a social media broadcast as a public figure.

It's why the media has scheduled interviews after games and not cameras in the locker rooms. The managers and players need a place to speak freely without outside judgement. That information is not, and should not be made public. If they want to air their grievances publicly, there are better ways to do it.
I agree what he said was wrong and stupid but it's done and people need to move on.

I'll say again he apologised for what he said. He didn't kill or rape anyone.

We all make mistakes and deserve 2nd chances.

The more people talk about it the more of an issue it becomes.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
26,982
45,286
It's hard to "move on" when Spurs fans react to his potential transfer like this and this and this and this and now even stalking a writer (who is not an American).

Is it overreacting if an LGBT fan doesn't feel safe to go to a Spurs game now? Or even speak their mind? And why are people jumping to defend Aurier before our own fans, he's not even kicked a ball for us yet?

The obvious thinking is "if it doesn't effect me, then no one else should care about it."

But after we've been linked with other RBs around the same price or even cheaper than Aurier, I don't see why it's such a crime to want one of them instead of a player who called his manager a "f*ggot" said he sucks Zlatan and "takes his whole balls" on social media three days before a R16 UCL match against Chelsea and then fakes an apology so poorly that Al-Kalaifi punched a door and multiple teammates wanted him off the squad. If it's okay to call Rose a snake after he says he wants to leave, I find it incredibly hypocritical to tell people they shouldn't have a problem with Aurier.

The fans are the reason the club continues to run, we may not be on the pitch or in the boardroom but without us there is no new stadium or £40m+ signing. Personally I'm proud we have fans writing articles and asking questions about how other fans may be impacted by the club's actions and wanting to keep us in check ethically. It's exactly what sets us apart from clubs like Chelski.

Bring on the negs and Come On You Spurs
I really do think you do our LGBT fans a disservice if you think someone expressing his disatisfaction at what he perceives as favouitism in an ignorant offensive way is going to leave them feeling unsafe to go to a Spurs game. What do you think they are a bunch of shrinking violets? Not sure any that I know would be scared off by this.
 

Guntz

Loves a good meme/gif
Aug 15, 2011
7,397
55,267
As long as he does the business on the pitch, and just gets on quietly with playing football.

I don't really care quite frankly about anything else. Everyone makes mistakes, let him get on with what he's paid to do.
 

John48

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2015
2,249
3,143
There are somethings that are beyond the pale & I would have thought if he'd done something like that Levy & Poch wouldn't touch him with a barge pole. They've obviously decided his transgressions are misdemeanours & they have almost certainly spoken to him to see if he understands the issues he's caused & whether he's learnt from them & they obviously think he has.

I'm prepared to go with their decision & I'm only really concerned about what he can do on the pitch for us.
 

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,176
19,689
It's hard to "move on" when Spurs fans react to his potential transfer like this and this and this and this and now even stalking a writer (who is not an American).

Is it overreacting if an LGBT fan doesn't feel safe to go to a Spurs game now? Or even speak their mind? And why are people jumping to defend Aurier before our own fans, he's not even kicked a ball for us yet?

The obvious thinking is "if it doesn't effect me, then no one else should care about it."

But after we've been linked with other RBs around the same price or even cheaper than Aurier, I don't see why it's such a crime to want one of them instead of a player who called his manager a "f*ggot" said he sucks Zlatan and "takes his whole balls" on social media three days before a R16 UCL match against Chelsea and then fakes an apology so poorly that Al-Kalaifi punched a door and multiple teammates wanted him off the squad. If it's okay to call Rose a snake after he says he wants to leave, I find it incredibly hypocritical to tell people they shouldn't have a problem with Aurier.

The fans are the reason the club continues to run, we may not be on the pitch or in the boardroom but without us there is no new stadium or £40m+ signing. Personally I'm proud we have fans writing articles and asking questions about how other fans may be impacted by the club's actions and wanting to keep us in check ethically. It's exactly what sets us apart from clubs like Chelski.

Bring on the negs and Come On You Spurs

You make some fine points but, whatever is said and done, there will always be nasty pieces of work everywhere in life, mate. If I saw anyone say something like that at the ground, I would step in and tell that person where to go and I would like to think many fellow Spurs fans would.

My suspicion is that most of those cowards wouldn't dare say something like that from anywhere other than from behind a keyboard though.

Bottom line, we aren't going to stop online idiots, like those posted, thinking and posting idiotic things like what you have pasted, and neither is the club. Their issues are more deep-rooted than just some player signing for our club. Twitter frankly should have disabled their accounts IMO.

In any case, I don't think this is a discussion about Serge Aurier anymore. My view about him is as posted.

I'm not going to pass further comment on the people who have written the articles, or the tone some have taken because my opinions would start another debate I'm not interested in having.
 

Hotspurious

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2016
518
2,072
It's hard to "move on" when Spurs fans react to his potential transfer like this and this and this and this and now even stalking a writer (who is not an American).

Is it overreacting if an LGBT fan doesn't feel safe to go to a Spurs game now? Or even speak their mind? And why are people jumping to defend Aurier before our own fans, he's not even kicked a ball for us yet?

The obvious thinking is "if it doesn't effect me, then no one else should care about it."

But after we've been linked with other RBs around the same price or even cheaper than Aurier, I don't see why it's such a crime to want one of them instead of a player who called his manager a "f*ggot" said he sucks Zlatan and "takes his whole balls" on social media three days before a R16 UCL match against Chelsea and then fakes an apology so poorly that Al-Kalaifi punched a door and multiple teammates wanted him off the squad. If it's okay to call Rose a snake after he says he wants to leave, I find it incredibly hypocritical to tell people they shouldn't have a problem with Aurier.

The fans are the reason the club continues to run, we may not be on the pitch or in the boardroom but without us there is no new stadium or £40m+ signing. Personally I'm proud we have fans writing articles and asking questions about how other fans may be impacted by the club's actions and wanting to keep us in check ethically. It's exactly what sets us apart from clubs like Chelski.

Bring on the negs and Come On You Spurs
Wait....what LGBT fan would feel unsafe to go to a Spurs match because some player made a crude homophobic remark in France? How exactly does that endanger a Spurs fan in the stands? I agree that his character issues deserve careful vetting by anyone thinking of signing him but some of the hyperbole is over the top. I think it may be worth taking a chance on the kid though I am concerned about his character issues and I think it's disingenuous to assume that anyone who thinks as much doesn't care about what he said and did because it doesn't affect them. That is simply not true for me and I assume I am not alone. Poch and Levy have more to lose than I do if this turns out to be a mistake so I will rely on their best judgment.
 

Kirito

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
4,898
9,554
If wanting a player to build bridges with a group of our fans who understandably aren't ecstatic at the thought of him signing given his past makes you cringe then I despair.

Forcing it on the player is what makes it cringeworthy. If he decides to make it happen then it's a good thing.
 
Top